Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):4917-24.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1972. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

Molecular pathways: coexpression of immune checkpoint molecules: signaling pathways and implications for cancer immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Molecular pathways: coexpression of immune checkpoint molecules: signaling pathways and implications for cancer immunotherapy

Christopher J Nirschl et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The expression of immune checkpoint molecules on T cells represents an important mechanism that the immune system uses to regulate responses to self-proteins. Checkpoint molecules include cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed death-1, lymphocyte activation gene-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin protein-3, and several others. Previous studies have identified individual roles for each of these molecules, but more recent data show that coexpression of checkpoint molecules occurs frequently on cancer-specific T cells as well as on pathogen-specific T cells in chronic infections. As the signaling pathways associated with each checkpoint molecule have not been fully elucidated, blocking multiple checkpoints with specific monoclonal antibodies results in improved outcomes in several chronic viral infections as well as in a wide array of preclinical models of cancer. Recent clinical data suggest similar effects in patients with metastatic melanoma. These findings support the concept that individual immune checkpoint molecules may function through nonoverlapping molecular mechanisms. Here, we review current data regarding immune checkpoint molecule signaling and coexpression, both in cancer and infectious disease, as well as the results of preclinical and clinical manipulations of checkpoint proteins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Relevant Conflicts of Interest:

CJN – none. CGD has served as a paid consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), CoStim Inc, and Pfizer. CGD has also received sponsored research funding from BMS. These relationships are managed through the Johns Hopkins Conflict of Interest Committee.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Known Signaling Pathways of Selected Checkpoint Molecules and Current Therapeutics
Upon binding B7-1 or B7-2, CTLA-4 recruits the phosphatases SHP2 and PP2A via the YVKM motif in its cytoplasmic domain. SHP2 recruitment results in attenuation of TCR signaling by dephosphorylating the CD3ζ chain. PP2A recruitment results in downstream dephosphorylation of AKT, further dampening the T cell activation pathway. PD-1 ligation by PD-L1 or PD-L2 also recruits SHP2 to the ITIM domain, resulting in membrane proximal decreases in TCR signaling. LAG-3 signaling is dependent on interaction with its ligand, MHC II, as well as its intracellular KIEELE domain. TIM-3 binds to Galectin-9, as well as other ligands. In the absence of ligand binding, TIM-3 is associated with Bat3, protecting the cell from TIM-3 mediated inhibition and allowing for greater activation. However, once TIM-3 binds to Galectin-9, Y265 is phosphorylated and the interaction with Bat3 is disrupted, allowing TIM-3 to deliver inhibitory signals to the T cell. BTLA and CD160 bind to Herpes Virus Entry Mediator (HVEM). BTLA contains an intracellular ITIM domain that may be important in signaling. 2B4 binds to CD48, but further signaling mechanisms are poorly understood. Ig domains are depicted in orange, mucin domains in green, cysteine rich domains in brown, and GPI anchors are depicted as bolded black lines. Current therapeutics to block checkpoint signaling molecules include both monoclonal antibodies and Ig fusion proteins. 1) Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab (BMS-734016), Tremelimumab (CP-675,206) 2) Anti-PD-1: Nivolumab (BMS-936558, MDX1106), Lambrolizumab (MK-3475), CT-011 3) Anti PD-L1: BMS-936559 (MDX1105), MEDI4736 4) PD-L2 Ig: AMP224 5) LAG-3 Ig: IMP321

References

    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:252–264. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharpe AH, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ. The function of programmed cell death 1 and its ligands in regulating autoimmunity and infection. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:239–245. - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2443–2454. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu W-J, Kefford R, et al. Safety and Tumor Responses with Lambrolizumab (Anti–PD-1) in Melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine - PMC - PubMed

Publication types