Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 18;3(7):e002929.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002929. Print 2013.

The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review

E Wallace  1 , J Lowry, S M Smith, T Fahey
Affiliations

The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review

E Wallace et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care.

Design: A computerised systematic literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they reported original data (≥10 cases) pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in primary care and were published in the English language. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.

Setting: Primary care.

Participants: Malpractice claimants.

Primary outcome: Malpractice claim (defined as a written demand for compensation for medical injury). We recorded: medical misadventure cited in claims, missed/delayed diagnoses cited in claims, outcome of claims, prevalence of claims and compensation awarded to claimants.

Results: Of the 7152 articles retrieved by electronic search, a total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative analysis. Twenty-eight studies presented data from medical indemnity malpractice claims databases and six studies presented survey data. Fifteen studies were based in the USA, nine in the UK, seven in Australia, one in Canada and two in France. The commonest medical misadventure resulting in claims was failure to or delay in diagnosis, which represented 26-63% of all claims across included studies. Common missed or delayed diagnoses included cancer and myocardial infarction in adults and meningitis in children. Medication error represented the second commonest domain representing 5.6-20% of all claims across included studies. The prevalence of malpractice claims in primary care varied across countries. In the USA and Australia when compared with other clinical disciplines, general practice ranked in the top five specialties accounting for the most claims, representing 7.6-20% of all claims. However, the majority of claims were successfully defended.

Conclusions: This review of malpractice claims in primary care highlights diagnosis and medication error as areas to be prioritised in developing educational strategies and risk management systems.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Medical Law; Primary Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of search strategy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526–34 - PubMed
    1. Sandars J, Esmail A. The frequency and nature of medical error in primary care: understanding the diversity across studies. Fam Pract 2003;20:231–6 - PubMed
    1. Elder NC, Dovey SM. Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract 2002;51:927–32 - PubMed
    1. Jacobs S, O'Beirne M, Derfiingher LP, et al. Errors and adverse events in family medicine: developing and validating a Canadian taxonomy of errors. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:271–6, 0 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomas EJ, Petersen LA. Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:61–7 - PMC - PubMed