Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;37(3):413-9.
doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.3.413. Epub 2013 Jun 30.

Analysis of publication status of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the korean academy of rehabilitation medicine

Affiliations

Analysis of publication status of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the korean academy of rehabilitation medicine

Jae Kuk Lim et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To analyze publication rate, time to publication and the characteristics of the abstracts presented at the annual Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine (KARM) meetings.

Methods: A total of 1,027 abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings were enrolled in the database and searched for their subsequent citation in PubMed, KoreaMed, and Google Scholar.

Results: The data analysis revealed that 317 (30.87%) abstracts, were published as full-length journal articles and publication rates by subject were not significantly different. The mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months, and the journals written in English (20.39±10.20) required a longer duration than those written in Korean (11.94±8.44) with statistical significance (p<0.001). There was no statistical difference (p=0.284) in the duration between domestic (17.61±10.37) and foreign (16.48±10.51) of the 220 domestic journal articles, 190 (86.76%) were published in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine and the 97 articles published in foreign journals were scattered over 60 different journals.

Conclusion: The publication rate of abstracts presented at the 2008 and 2009 annual KARM meetings was 30.87% and the mean time to publication was 17.17±10.48 months.

Keywords: Abstracts; Journal article; Publications; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The titles of journals and the number of articles registered therein are shown. Most articles published in domestic journals were concentrated in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine (Ann Rehabil Med), whereas articles published in foreign journals were scattered over various journals.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
On the survival graph, no significant difference between domestic and foreign journals was shown (p=0.284). Analyzing methods was Gehan's generalized Wilcoxon test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The publication duration of the journals written in English was longer than that of the journals written in Korean on the survival graph (p<0.001). Analysis methods were Gehan's generalized Wilcoxon test.

References

    1. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):MR000005. - PubMed
    1. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272:158–162. - PubMed
    1. Gorman RL, Oderda GM. Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality? Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990;32:470–472. - PubMed
    1. Castillo J, Garcia-Guasch R, Cifuentes I. Fate of abstracts from the Paris 1995 European Society of Anaesthesiologists meeting. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:888–893. - PubMed
    1. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc. 2003;91:42–46. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources