Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 19:13:673.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-673.

Determinants of government HIV/AIDS financing: a 10-year trend analysis from 125 low- and middle-income countries

Carlos Ávila  1 , Dejan Loncar, Peter Amico, Paul De Lay
Affiliations

Determinants of government HIV/AIDS financing: a 10-year trend analysis from 125 low- and middle-income countries

Carlos Ávila et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Trends and predictors of domestic spending from public sources provide national authorities and international donors with a better understanding of the HIV financing architecture, the fulfillment of governments' commitments and potential for long-term sustainability.

Methods: We analyzed government financing of HIV using evidence from country reports on domestic spending. Panel data from 2000 to 2010 included information from 647 country-years amongst 125 countries. A random-effects model was used to analyze ten year trends and identify independent predictors of public HIV spending.

Results: Low- and middle-income countries spent US$ 2.1 billion from government sources in 2000, growing to US$ 6.6 billion in 2010, a three-fold increase. Per capita spending in 2010 ranged from 5 cents in low-level HIV epidemics in the Middle East to US$ 32 in upper-middle income countries with generalized HIV epidemics in Southern Africa. The average domestic public spending per capita was US$ 2.55. The analysis found that GDP per capita and HIV prevalence are positively associated with increasing levels of HIV-spending from public sources; a 10 percent increase in HIV prevalence is associated with a 2.5 percent increase in domestic funding for HIV. Additionally, a 10 percent increase in GDP per capita is associated with an 11.49 percent increase in public spending for HIV and these associations were highly significant.

Conclusion: Domestic resources in low- and middle-income countries showed a threefold increase between 2000 and 2010 and currently support 50 percent of the global response with 41 percent coming from sub-Saharan Africa. Domestic spending in LMICs was associated with increased economic growth and an increased burden of HIV. Sustained increases in funding for HIV from public sources were observed in all regions and emphasize the increasing importance of government financing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Domestic Public HIV Spending Globally and by Region (2000-2010).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between GDP and per-capita Spending on AIDS in 2010.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage change in domestic public HIV expenditures during 2005-2009 as compared to 2000-2004.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Haacker M. Financing HIV/AIDS programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Aff. 2009;28(6):1606. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1606. - DOI - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. Together We Will End AIDS. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2012.
    1. Amico P, Aran C, Avila C. HIV spending as a share of total health expenditure: an analysis of regional variation in a multi-country study. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):e12997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012997. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. National AIDS Spending Assessment: A Notebook on Methods Definitions and Procedures to Measure HIV and AIDS Financial Flows and Expenditures at the Country Level. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2009.
    1. World Bank. The Worldwide Governance Indicator: Methodology and Analytical Issues. In. Washington DC: World Bank; 2010.

MeSH terms