Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Oct;29(10):1190-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

CenteringPregnancy-Africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development Goals

Crystal L Patil  1 , Elizabeth T Abrams, Carrie Klima, Chrissie P N Kaponda, Sebalda C Leshabari, Susan C Vonderheid, Martha Kamanga, Kathleen F Norr
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

CenteringPregnancy-Africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development Goals

Crystal L Patil et al. Midwifery. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: severe health worker shortages and resource limitations negatively affect quality of antenatal care (ANC) throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Group ANC, specifically CenteringPregnancy (CP), may offer an innovative approach to enable midwives to offer higher quality ANC.

Objective: our overarching goal was to prepare to conduct a clinical trial of CenteringPregnancy-Africa (CP-Africa) in Malawi and Tanzania. In Phase 1, our goal was to determine the acceptability of CP as a model for ANC in both countries. In Phase 2, our objective was to develop CP-Africa session content consistent with the Essential Elements of CP model and with national standards in both Malawi and Tanzania. In Phase 3, our objective was to pilot CP-Africa in Malawi to determine whether sessions could be conducted with fidelity to the Centering process.

Setting: Phases 1 and 2 took place in Malawi and Tanzania. Phase 3, the piloting of two sessions of CP-Africa, occurred at two sites in Malawi: a district hospital and a small clinic.

Design: we used an Action Research approach to promote partnerships among university researchers, the Centering Healthcare Institute, health care administrators, health professionals and women attending ANC to develop CP-Africa session content and pilot this model of group ANC.

Participants: for Phases 1 and 2, members of the Ministries of Health, health professionals and pregnant women in Malawi and Tanzania were introduced to and interviewed about CP. In Phase 2, we finalised CP-Africa content and trained 13 health professionals in the Centering Healthcare model. In Phase 3, we conducted a small pilot with 24 pregnant women (12 at each site).

Measurements and findings: participants enthusiastically embraced CP-Africa as an acceptable model of ANC health care delivery. The CP-Africa content met both CP and national standards. The pilot established that the CP model could be implemented with process fidelity to the 13 Essential Elements. Several implementation challenges and strategies to address these challenges were identified.

Key conclusions: preliminary data suggest that CP-Africa is feasible in resource-constrained, low-literacy, high-HIV settings in sub-Saharan Africa. By improving the quality of ANC delivery, midwives have an opportunity to make a contribution towards Millennium Development Goals (MDG) targeting improvements in child, maternal and HIV-related health outcomes (MDGs 4, 5 and 6). A clinical trial is needed to establish efficacy.

Implications for practice: CP-Africa also has the potential to reduce job-related stress and enhance job satisfaction for midwives in low income countries. If CP can be transferred with fidelity to process in sub-Saharan Africa and retain similar results to those reported in clinical trials, it has the potential to benefit pregnant women and their infants and could make a positive contribution to MGDs 4, 5 and 6.

Keywords: Antenatal care; Group care; Millennium Development Goals; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

None of the authors of this manuscript have any conflict of interest to disclose that might influence the work described here including employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, etc.

References

    1. Baldwin KA. Comparison of Selected Outcomes of CenteringPregnancy Versus Traditional Prenatal Care. The Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 2006;51(4):266–272. - PubMed
    1. Barbour R, Schostak S. Interviewing and focus groups. In: Someke B, Lewis C, editors. Research Methods in Social Sciences. London: Sage Publication; 2005.
    1. Bentley ME, Pelto GH, Straus WL, Schumann DA, Adegbola C, Oni GA, Brown KH, et al. Rapid ethnographic assessment: Applications in a diarrhea management program. Social Science & Medicine. 1988;27(1):107–116. - PubMed
    1. Bergsjø P, Villar J. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1997;76(1):15–25. - PubMed
    1. Bertrand JT, Brown JE, Ward VM. Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data. Evaluation Review. 1992;16(2):198–209.

Publication types

MeSH terms