Dermal autografts as a substitute for acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a prospective comparative study
- PMID: 23871569
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.07.002
Dermal autografts as a substitute for acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a prospective comparative study
Abstract
The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in tissue expander breast reconstruction has several advantages but increased complications have been reported. Dermal autografts may offer a safer and more cost-effective alternative. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the outcomes of tissue expander breast reconstruction using dermal autografts with ADM-assisted reconstruction. Patients undergoing tissue expander breast reconstruction with either ADM or dermal autografts were enrolled. Autografts were harvested from the lower abdomen. At each follow-up visit, patients were surveyed on a seven-point scale for scar and overall satisfaction. Biopsies taken at the time of device exchange were evaluated histologically with CD34 staining to assess tissue integration and vessel ingrowth. Expansion parameters, complications, procedural costs, and operative times were compared. Forty-eight patients were enrolled (76 breasts). Twenty-seven patients received ADM, and twenty-one patients received dermal autograft. Wound healing complications were significantly higher in the ADM group (14.8% versus 4.8%, p-value = 0.03), as were major complications (18.5% versus 0%, p-value < 0.01). Histologic vessel counts in the autograft group averaged 21 vessels/mm(2), compared to 7 vessels/mm(2) in the ADM group (p-value < 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in scar satisfaction or overall satisfaction. Patients receiving dermal autograft had a lower incidence of major complications and delayed wound healing than patients who received ADM. Despite harvest time, the overall cost of the ADM-assisted expander placement was higher. Dermal autograft-assisted breast reconstruction offers many of the benefits of ADM, but with a lower cost and improved safety profile.
Keywords: Acellular dermal matrices; AlloDerm(®); Breast reconstruction; Dermal autograft; Tissue expander.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Review.Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6S Suppl 5):S282-S285. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001041. Ann Plast Surg. 2017. PMID: 28296716
-
A Comparison of Dermal Autograft and Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Aesthetic Outcomes and Capsular Contracture.Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;74 Suppl 4:S214-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000375. Ann Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 25389715
-
Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):10-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f6765. Ann Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 21862915
-
The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014. PMID: 24508194 Review.
-
Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1194-201. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0213-2. Epub 2013 Oct 3. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 24091489 Review.
Cited by
-
One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review.Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6486859. doi: 10.1155/2017/6486859. Epub 2017 Oct 2. Biomed Res Int. 2017. PMID: 29098159 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast reconstruction using hand-meshed free dermal autograft: a case series.BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 22;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03055-9. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40696334 Free PMC article.
-
The use of dermal templates in dermato-surgery and patient perspectives.Dermatol Reports. 2024 Feb 15;16(3):9941. doi: 10.4081/dr.2024.9941. eCollection 2024 Sep 2. Dermatol Reports. 2024. PMID: 39290555 Free PMC article.
-
Wound Healing: Biologics, Skin Substitutes, Biomembranes and Scaffolds.Healthcare (Basel). 2014 Sep 10;2(3):356-400. doi: 10.3390/healthcare2030356. Healthcare (Basel). 2014. PMID: 27429283 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wound Healing after Acellular Dermal Substitute Positioning in Dermato-Oncological Surgery: A Prospective Comparative Study.Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;13(2):463. doi: 10.3390/life13020463. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36836820 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical