Psychophysical factors that have been applied to clinical perimetry
- PMID: 23872241
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.005
Psychophysical factors that have been applied to clinical perimetry
Abstract
Perimetry is the most common clinical diagnostic test procedure for evaluating the status of peripheral visual function in the management of ocular and neurologic diseases. This procedure has an extended history, and its design, implementation and interpretation is dependent on many principles that have been developed through visual psychophysical studies of target size, target duration, background adaptation level, chromatic characteristics and other stimulus properties (see Greve, 1973; Johnson, 1994, chap. 17, 1996, 2008, 2010, chap. 23; Johnson & Keltner, 1998, chap. 7; Johnson & Sample, 2002, chap. 22; Johnson & Wall, 2011, chap. 35; Wall & Johnson, 2005, chap. 2 for reviews). This paper will provide a general overview of the history of perimetry, selection of stimulus parameters, development of test strategies, clinical testing conditions, new procedures and approaches to perimetry, experimental design, analysis and interpretation methods, hypothesis testing, prediction and forecasting procedures, and other related topics. It is somewhat paradoxical that although there have been major advances in all of these areas that have significantly enhanced the utility and value of this clinical diagnostic test, the fundamental methodology has remained mostly unchanged for thousands of years. It is hoped that this overview will be of assistance to investigators and clinicians who wish to use or modify this diagnostic procedure for their ongoing career activities.
Keywords: Perimetry; Psychophysics; Strategies; Test procedures; Visual fields.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A history of perimetry and visual field testing.Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jan;88(1):E8-15. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182004c3b. Optom Vis Sci. 2011. PMID: 21131878
-
The visual fields: an interdisciplinary history II. neurosurgeons and quantitative perimetry.J Clin Neurosci. 2008 Mar;15(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.09.017. J Clin Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18178441
-
Mechanisms mediating visual detection in static perimetry.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Sep;34(10):3011-23. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993. PMID: 8360032
-
[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].Ophthalmologe. 2005 Aug;102(8):821-7; quiz 828-9. doi: 10.1007/s00347-005-1212-8. Ophthalmologe. 2005. PMID: 16044280 Review. German.
-
The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Jul;100(4):313-332. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12551. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Clin Exp Optom. 2017. PMID: 28640951 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A framework for assessing glaucoma progression using structural and functional indices jointly.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235255. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32609734 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast sensitivity isocontours of the central visual field.Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 12;9(1):11603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48026-2. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31406197 Free PMC article.
-
Intersession test-retest variability of conventional and novel parameters using the MP-1 microperimeter.Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 23;10:29-42. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92018. eCollection 2016. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 26730178 Free PMC article.
-
Visual Field Tests: A Narrative Review of Different Perimetric Methods.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 23;13(9):2458. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092458. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38730989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing a Screening Tool for Areas of Abnormal Central Vision Using Visual Stimuli With Natural Scene Statistics.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):34. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.2.34. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022. PMID: 35195703 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources