Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990;80(3):562-76.
doi: 10.1007/BF00227996.

Modulatory influences of a moving visual noise background on bar-evoked responses of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex

Affiliations

Modulatory influences of a moving visual noise background on bar-evoked responses of cells in area 18 of the feline visual cortex

J M Crook. Exp Brain Res. 1990.

Abstract

The modulatory influence of a synchronously moving visual noise background on responsiveness to an optimally-oriented moving bar stimulus was investigated in visual cortical area 18 of the lightly-anaesthetized cat. The bar and noise background were swept along the axis orthogonal to bar orientation, with the same phase, velocity and amplitude of motion. Cells which were insensitive to motion of visual noise per se or weakly responsive to individual 'grains' in the noise sample showed suppression of bar-evoked responses by simultaneous motion of the noise background. Percent suppression declined with increase in bar length, over a range which could exceed the maximum estimate of receptive field length. The decline in percent suppression was non-linear, becoming progressively flatter in slope as bar length was increased until an asymptotic value was reached; observations on end-stopped cells and on end-free cells with restricted length summation verified that percent suppression was related specifically to the length of the comparison bar and not to the strength of response it evoked. Percent suppression and the extent over which it declined with increase in bar length were comparable for preferred and opposite directions of bar motion even in cells with radically different length-response functions in the two directions, including end-stopped cells with direction-selective end-zones. In contrast to end-inhibition, which was maximal at or near the preferred velocity for a bar of optimal length, percent suppression by motion of the noise background was essentially velocity-invariant; in velocity tuned and velocity high-pass cells, background motion reduced the slope(s) of the velocity-response function, implying that the suppressive action of moving noise backgrounds is divisive rather than subtractive. It is argued that the suppression derives predominantly from an axo-somatic noise-sensitive inhibitory input from superficial- and deep-layer, large basket cells in orientation 'columns' at some distance from those of their target cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(3):791-803 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res. 1986 Oct 29;386(1-2):93-104 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1980 May;302:507-34 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1984 Oct 10;229(1):1-38 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 1987;27(5):723-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources