Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research
- PMID: 23874162
- PMCID: PMC3712909
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001482
Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research
Abstract
Carlijn Hooijmans and colleagues discuss developments that might improve the quality and translation of animal research, focusing on the importance of systematic reviews, the role of an international register of animal studies, and cooperation across the scientific community.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Sandercock P, Roberts I (2002) Systematic reviews of animal experiments. Lancet 360: 586. - PubMed
-
- Horn J, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Luiten PG, Limburg M (2001) Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review. Stroke 32: 2433–2438. - PubMed
-
- Kenter MJ, Cohen AF (2006) Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368: 1387–1391. - PubMed
-
- Hooijmans CR, de Vries RB, Rovers MM, Gooszen HG, Ritskes-Hoitinga M (2012) The effects of probiotic supplementation on experimental acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 7: e48811 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048811 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
