Neglecting the left side of a city square but not the left side of its clock: prevalence and characteristics of representational neglect

Abstract

Representational neglect, which is characterized by the failure to report left-sided details of a mental image from memory, can occur after a right hemisphere lesion. In this study, we set out to verify the hypothesis that two distinct forms of representational neglect exist, one involving object representation and the other environmental representation. As representational neglect is considered rare, we also evaluated the prevalence and frequency of its association with perceptual neglect. We submitted a group of 96 unselected, consecutive, chronic, right brain-damaged patients to an extensive neuropsychological evaluation that included two representational neglect tests: the Familiar Square Description Test and the O'Clock Test. Representational neglect, as well as perceptual neglect, was present in about one-third of the sample. Most patients neglected the left side of imagined familiar squares but not the left side of imagined clocks. The present data show that representational neglect is not a rare disorder and also support the hypothesis that two different types of mental representations (i.e. topological and non-topological images) may be selectively damaged in representational neglect.

Figure 1. This figure reports the percentage of patients with perceptual neglect (PercNeg), representational neglect (RepNeg), perceptual neglect associated with representational neglect (PercNeg+RepNeg) and no signs of neglect (Noneg).

Figure 2. This figure reports the percentage of patients affected by selective representational neglect for topological images (T-ReprNeg), selective representational neglect for non-topological images (Nt-ReprNeg), and representational neglect for both topological and non-topological images (T-RepNeg+Nt-ReprNeg) calculated on the sub-sample of 34 patients affected by representational neglect.