Multivariate prognostic analysis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy
- PMID: 23875071
- PMCID: PMC3714459
- DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.3.222
Multivariate prognostic analysis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors and treatment outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix who underwent radical hysterectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy.
Methods: A total of 130 patients with stage IB to IIB cervical adenocarcinoma treated with hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy from 1982 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological data including age, stage, tumor size, the number of positive node sites, lymphovascular space invasion, parametrial invasion, deep stromal invasion (>2/3 thickness), corpus invasion, vaginal infiltration, and ovarian metastasis, adjuvant therapy, and survival were collected and Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent prognostic factors.
Results: An estimated five-year survival rate of stage IB1 was 96.6%, 75.0% in stage IB2, 100% in stage IIA, and 52.8% in stage IIB. Prognosis of patients with one positive-node site is similar to that of those with negative-node. Prognosis of patients with multiple positive-node sites was significantly poorer than that of negative and one positive-node site. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion, and parametrial invasion were independent prognostic factors for cervical adenocarcinoma. Survival of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma was stratified into three groups by the combination of three independent prognostic factors.
Conclusion: Lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion, and parametrial invasion were shown to be independent prognostic factors for cervical adenocarcinoma treated with hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma; Cervical cancer; Multivariate analysis; Prognosis; Radical hysterectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures




References
-
- Schorge JO, Knowles LM, Lea JS. Adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2004;5:119–127. - PubMed
-
- Look KY, Brunetto VL, Clarke-Pearson DL, Averette HE, Major FJ, Alvarez RD, et al. An analysis of cell type in patients with surgically staged stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;63:304–311. - PubMed
-
- Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Morris M, Smith TL. Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;59:38–44. - PubMed
-
- Brand E, Berek JS, Hacker NF. Controversies in the management of cervical carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:261–269. - PubMed
-
- Goodman HM, Buttlar CA, Niloff JM, Welch WR, Marck A, Feuer EJ, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 1989;33:241–247. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical