Clavicle and coracoid process drilling technique for truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction
- PMID: 23876623
- DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.022
Clavicle and coracoid process drilling technique for truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction
Abstract
Background: High-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations require surgical treatment, as conservative treatment may result in functional decline or persistent pain. Although many surgical techniques have been described in the literature, there is still no non-controversial gold standard procedure for AC joint dislocation. The different orientation of the two components of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments has been proven to account for different functions. However, the majority of the techniques reconstruct the CC ligaments with a single structure. The purposes of this study were to assess the feasibility of truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (TACCR) and to determine the corresponding drilling parameter.
Methods: We constructed virtual three-dimensional (3D) models of 105 shoulders from computed tomography (CT) scan data by using SuperImage software. For each model, the attachment sites and footprint dimensions of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments were defined and adjusted according to previously defined anatomic parameters and individual measurement results. Virtual drilling and 3D measurement were carried out in each model separately. Guided by the drilling parameter, we performed TACCR on 24 shoulders from 12 whole cadavers after transecting the AC and CC ligaments.
Results: The collinear drilling technique was noted to breach the bone cortex of the clavicle and/or the coracoid process in 95 of 105 virtual models (90.5%). No cortical breach was observed using a non-collinear drilling technique. The anteversion angulation of the conoid-coracoid tunnel ranged from 10° to 15° (mean value 12.4°). The extraversion angulation of the conoid-coracoid tunnel varied from 5° to 10° (mean value 6.8°). The anteversion angulation of the trapezoid-coracoid tunnel ranged from 20° to 30° (mean value 25.2°). There were no failures when performing the non-collinear drilling technique on cadaver models.
Conclusions: The collinear drilling technique is not technically feasible for TACCR. For this reason, we recommend the non-collinear drilling technique, which provides the ability to prepare bony tunnels without any risk of cortical breach.
Clinical relevance: Based on this computer and cadaver model study, we have devised a novel drilling technique to restore the CC ligaments anatomically.
Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint; Clavicular tunnels; Coracoclavicular ligaments; Coracoidal tunnels; Drilling technique; Truly anatomic reconstruction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Anatomic Tunnel Placement Is Not Feasible by Transclavicular-Transcoracoid Drilling Technique for Coracoclavicular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2012-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Apr 10. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29653796
-
Coracoclavicular ligaments anatomical reconstruction: a feasibility study.Int J Med Robot. 2015 Jun;11(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1579. Epub 2014 Apr 8. Int J Med Robot. 2015. PMID: 24711365
-
Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.008. Epub 2012 Apr 20. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. PMID: 22521389
-
Factors influencing clavicular tunnel widening after single bundle coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 7;19(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05201-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39506765 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.Clin Sports Med. 2023 Oct;42(4):589-598. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Clin Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37716723 Review.
Cited by
-
[Arthroscopically assisted techniques for treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries].Unfallchirurg. 2015 May;118(5):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0004-0. Unfallchirurg. 2015. PMID: 25964020 Review. German.
-
Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1185-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03271-6. Epub 2022 May 7. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023. PMID: 35523973
-
Treatment of a Failed Type V Acromioclavicular Separation Due to Coracoid Fracture: Revision of Acromioclavicular-Coracoclavicular Reconstruction and Coracoid Fixation.Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Feb 2;10(3):e675-e681. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.055. eCollection 2021 Mar. Arthrosc Tech. 2021. PMID: 33738201 Free PMC article.
-
Arthroscopically guided navigation for repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a safe technique with reduced intraoperative radiation exposure.Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Dec 22;9:41. doi: 10.1186/s13037-015-0087-0. eCollection 2015. Patient Saf Surg. 2015. PMID: 26702301 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations treated by the GraftRope device.Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):225-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.976806. Epub 2014 Oct 17. Acta Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25323800 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical