Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;32(12):1805-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2332-1. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany

Affiliations

Cost per responder of TNF-α therapies in Germany

Christian Gissel et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors ranked highest in German pharmaceutical expenditure in 2011. Their most important application is the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our objective is to analyze cost per responder of TNF-α inhibitors for RA from the German Statutory Health Insurance funds' perspective. We aim to conduct the analysis based on randomized comparative effectiveness studies of the relevant treatments for the German setting. For inclusion of effectiveness studies, we require results in terms of response rates as defined by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) or American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. We identify conventional triple therapy as the relevant comparator. We calculate cost per responder based on German direct medical costs. Direct clinical comparisons could be identified for both etanercept and infliximab compared to triple therapy. For infliximab, cost per responder was 216,392 euros for ACR50 and 432,784 euros for ACR70 responses. For etanercept, cost per ACR70 responder was 321,527 euros. Cost was lower for response defined by EULAR criteria, but data was only available for infliximab. Cost per responder is overestimated by 40% due to inclusion of taxes and mandatory rebates in German drugs' list prices. Our analysis shows specific requirements for cost-effectiveness analysis in Germany. Cost per responder for TNF-α treatment in the German setting is more than double the cost estimated in a similar analysis for the USA, which measured against placebo. The difference in results shows the critical role of the correct comparator for a specific setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TWJ. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1094–1108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwabe U, Paffrath D. Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2012. Berlin: Springer; 2012.
    1. Schneider S, Schmitt G, Richter W. Prevalence and correlates of inflammatory arthritis in Germany: data from the First National Health Survey. Rheumatol Int. 2006;27(1):29–38. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0153-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wasmus A, Kindel P, Mattussek S, Raspe HH. Activity and severity of rheumatoid arthritis in Hannover/FRG and in one regional referral center. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1989;79:33–44. doi: 10.3109/03009748909092611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zink A, Huscher D, Schneider M (2010) How closely does rheumatology treatment follow the guidelines?: ambition and reality. Z Rheumatol 69(4):318–326. doi:10.1007/s00393-009-0522-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources