Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative
- PMID: 23877585
- PMCID: PMC3910422
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0451-4
Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative
Abstract
Purpose: To test the impact of method of administration (MOA) on the measurement characteristics of items developed in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
Methods: Two non-overlapping parallel 8-item forms from each of three PROMIS domains (physical function, fatigue, and depression) were completed by 923 adults (age 18-89) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, or rheumatoid arthritis. In a randomized cross-over design, subjects answered one form by interactive voice response (IVR) technology, paper questionnaire (PQ), personal digital assistant (PDA), or personal computer (PC) on the Internet, and a second form by PC, in the same administration. Structural invariance, equivalence of item responses, and measurement precision were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory methods.
Results: Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis supported equivalence of factor structure across MOA. Analyses by item response theory found no differences in item location parameters and strongly supported the equivalence of scores across MOA.
Conclusions: We found no statistically or clinically significant differences in score levels in IVR, PQ, or PDA administration as compared to PC. Availability of large item response theory-calibrated PROMIS item banks allowed for innovations in study design and analysis.
Figures




References
-
- Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value Health. 2008;11(2):322–333. - PubMed
-
- Raat H, Mangunkusumo RT, Landgraf JM, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of adolescent health status measurement by the Child Health Questionnaire Child Form (CHQ-CF): Internet administration compared with the standard paper version. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(4):675–685. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yu SC. Comparison of Internet-based and paper-based questionnaires in Taiwan using multisample invariance approach. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2007;10(4):501–507. - PubMed
-
- Duncan P, Reker D, Kwon S, et al. Measuring stroke impact with the Stroke Impact Scale: Telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Medical Care. 2005;43(5):507–515. - PubMed
-
- Hepner KA, Brown JA, Hays RD. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices. Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2005;28(4):377–389. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01 AR052170/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52177/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052181/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52186/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52158/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52170/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052177/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52181/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052158/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052155/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052171/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 AR052186/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52171/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
- U01AR52155/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources