Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 22;3(7):e003175.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175. Print 2013.

Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study

Melanie A Wakefield  1 , Linda Hayes, Sarah Durkin, Ron Borland
Affiliations

Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: a cross-sectional study

Melanie A Wakefield et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether smokers smoking from packs required under Australia's plain packaging law had different smoking beliefs and quitting thoughts, compared with those still smoking from branded packs.

Design: Cross-sectional survey during the roll-out phase of the law, analysed by timing of survey.

Setting: Australian state of Victoria, November 2012.

Participants: 536 cigarette smokers with a usual brand, of whom 72.3% were smoking from a plain pack and 27.7% were smoking from a branded pack.

Primary outcome measures: Perceived quality and satisfaction of cigarettes compared with 1 year ago, frequency of thoughts of smoking harm, perceived exaggeration of harms, frequency of thoughts of quitting, quitting priority in life, intention to quit, approval of large graphic health warnings and plain packaging.

Results: Compared with branded pack smokers, those smoking from plain packs perceived their cigarettes to be lower in quality (adjusted OR (AdjOR)=1.66, p=0.045), tended to perceive their cigarettes as less satisfying than a year ago (AdjOR=1.70, p=0.052), were more likely to have thought about quitting at least once a day in the past week (AdjOR=1.81, p=0.013) and to rate quitting as a higher priority in their lives (F=13.11, df=1, p<0.001). Plain pack smokers were more likely to support the policy than branded pack smokers (AdjOR=1.51, p=0.049). Branded and plain pack smokers did not differ on measures of less immediate smoking intentions, frequency of thoughts about harms or perceived exaggeration of harms. Appeal outcomes, but not other outcomes, were sensitive to the extent of roll-out, with responses from branded pack smokers approaching those of plain pack smokers, once 80% of survey respondents were smoking from plain packs 1-2 weeks before the December implementation date.

Conclusions: The early indication is that plain packaging is associated with lower smoking appeal, more support for the policy and more urgency to quit among adult smokers.

Keywords: Public Health; Social Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Appeal outcomes by survey week for plain and branded pack smokers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011. Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/tppa2011180/ (accessed 5 July 2013).
    1. Australian Government Trade Practices (Consumer Product Information Standards) (Tobacco) Regulations 2004. Canberra, Australia, 2007
    1. Retail World Annual report: Market sizes and shares. 2011
    1. Australian Bureau of Statistics Information paper: an introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2006. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008:Catalogue no. 2039.0
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National health data dictionary. Version 8.0. AIHW Catalogue No. HWI 18. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1999

LinkOut - more resources