Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;10(1):15-9.
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.111759.

A comparative study of accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam and multi-slice computed tomographies for evaluation of mandibular canal location in dry mandibles

Asieh Zamani Naser  1 , Bahar Behdad Mehr
Affiliations

A comparative study of accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam and multi-slice computed tomographies for evaluation of mandibular canal location in dry mandibles

Asieh Zamani Naser et al. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Cross- sectional tomograms have been used for optimal pre-operative planning of dental implant placement. The aim of the present study was to assess the accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) measurements of specific distances around the mandibular canal by comparing them to those obtained from Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) images.

Materials and methods: Ten hemi-mandible specimens were examined using CBCT and MSCT. Before imaging, wires were placed at 7 locations between the anterior margin of the third molar and the anterior margin of the second premolar as reference points. Following distances were measured by two observers on each cross-sectional CBCT and MSCT image: Mandibular Width (W), Length (L), Upper Distance (UD), Lower Distance (LD), Buccal Distance (BD), and Lingual Distance (LID). The obtained data were evaluated using SPSS software, applying paired t-test and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: There was a significant difference between the values obtained by MSCT and CBCT measurement for all areas such as H, W, UD, LD, BD, and LID, (P < 0.001), with a difference less than 1 mm. The ICC for all distances by both techniques, measured by a single observer with a one week interval and between 2 observers was 99% and 98%, respectively. Comparing the obtained data of both techniques indicates that the difference between two techniques is 2.17% relative to MSCT.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that there is significant difference between measurements obtained by CBCT and MSCT. However, the difference is not clinically significant.

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography linear measurements; multi-slice computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hemi-mandibule and its position in the CBCT unit
Figure 2
Figure 2
CBCT cross-sectional images
Figure 3
Figure 3
MSCT cross-sectional images
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K, Okano T. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: A comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:226–32. - PubMed
    1. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Patola J. Accuracy of linear measurents using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:10–7. - PubMed
    1. Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of theNewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005;34:28–31. - PubMed
    1. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:67–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:228–31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources