Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;94(12):2433-2439.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Jul 20.

Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test to assess anxiety in cardiovascular rehabilitation patients

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test to assess anxiety in cardiovascular rehabilitation patients

Birgit Abberger et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a computer adaptive test for the assessment of anxiety in cardiovascular rehabilitation patients (ACAT-cardio) that tailors an optimal test for each patient and enables precise and time-effective measurement.

Design: Simulation study, validation study (against the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the physical component summary scale of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey), and longitudinal study (beginning and end of rehabilitation).

Setting: Cardiac rehabilitation centers.

Participants: Cardiovascular rehabilitation patients: simulation study sample (n=106; mean age, 57.8y; 25.5% women) and validation and longitudinal study sample (n=138; mean age, 58.6 and 57.9y, respectively; 16.7% and 12.1% women, respectively).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and ACAT-cardio.

Results: The mean number of items was 9.2 with an average processing time of 1:13 minutes when an SE ≤.50 was used as a stopping rule; with an SE ≤.32, there were 28 items and a processing time of 3:47 minutes. Validity could be confirmed via correlations between .68 and .81 concerning convergent validity (ACAT-cardio vs Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale) and correlations between -.47 and -.30 concerning discriminant validity (ACAT-cardio vs 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary scale). Sensitivity to change was moderate to high with standardized response means between .45 and .82.

Conclusions: The ACAT-cardio shows good psychometric properties and provides the opportunity for an innovative and time-effective assessment of anxiety in cardiovascular rehabilitation. A more flexible stopping rule might further improve the ACAT-cardio. Additionally, testing in other cardiovascular populations would increase generalizability.

Keywords: 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey; ACAT-cardio; AIB-cardio; Anxiety; CAT; CVD; Cardiovascular diseases; Computers; HADS; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; ICD-10; IRT; International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision; RehaCAT-Cardio; Rehabilitation; SF-12; SRM; anxiety item bank for cardiovascular patients; cardiovascular disease; computer adaptive test; computer adaptive test for cardiac patients undergoing rehabilitation; computer adaptive test for the assessment of anxiety in cardiovascular rehabilitation patients; item response theory; standardized response mean.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types