Do we still need pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes? A risk-benefit critique in 2013
- PMID: 23882041
- PMCID: PMC3920795
- DOI: 10.2337/dcS13-2031
Do we still need pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes? A risk-benefit critique in 2013
Figures
References
-
- Juutilainen A, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Similarity of the impact of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged subjects. Diabetes Care 2008;31:714–719 - PubMed
-
- Schernthaner G, Matthews DR, Charbonnel B, Hanefeld M, Brunetti P, Quartet [corrected] Study Group Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:6068–6076 - PubMed
-
- Charbonnel B, Schernthaner G, Brunetti P, et al. Long-term efficacy and tolerability of add-on pioglitazone therapy to failing monotherapy compared with addition of gliclazide or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005;48:1093–1104 - PubMed
-
- Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, et al. DURATION-4 Study Group Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:252–258 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Derosa G. Efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison with other oral antihyperglycaemic agents. Drugs 2010;70:1945–1961 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
