Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 24;8(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-12.

The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation

Affiliations

The effectiveness of scoliosis screening programs: methods for systematic review and expert panel recommendations formulation

Marie Beauséjour et al. Scoliosis. .

Abstract

Background: Literature on scoliosis screening is vast, however because of the observational nature of available data and methodological flaws, data interpretation is often complex, leading to incomplete and sometimes, somewhat misleading conclusions. The need to propose a set of methods for critical appraisal of the literature about scoliosis screening, a comprehensive summary and rating of the available evidence appeared essential.

Methods: To address these gaps, the study aims were: i) To propose a framework for the assessment of published studies on scoliosis screening effectiveness; ii) To suggest specific questions to be answered on screening effectiveness instead of trying to reach a global position for or against the programs; iii) To contextualize the knowledge through expert panel consultation and meaningful recommendations. The general methodological approach proceeds through the following steps: Elaboration of the conceptual framework; Formulation of the review questions; Identification of the criteria for the review; Selection of the studies; Critical assessment of the studies; Results synthesis; Formulation and grading of recommendations in response to the questions. This plan follows at best GRADE Group (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) requirements for systematic reviews, assessing quality of evidence and grading the strength of recommendations.

Conclusions: In this article, the methods developed in support of this work are presented since they may be of some interest for similar reviews in scoliosis and orthopaedic fields.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the general methodological approach.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual framework of Effectiveness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study selection algorithm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grivas TB, Wade MH Negrini S, O’Brien JP, Maruyama T, Hawes MCm Rigo M, Weiss HR, Kotwicki T, Vasiliadis ES, Sulam LN, Neuhous T. Sosort Consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today? Scoliosis. 2007;2:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-2-17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plaszewski M, Nowobilski R, Kowalski P, Cieslinski M. Screening for scoliosis: different countries’ perspectives and evidence-based health care. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012;35:13–19. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32834df622. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Linker B. A dangerous curve. The role of history in America’s scoliosis screening programs. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:606–616. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Periodic Health Examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193–1254. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldbloom RB. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care . Ottawa: Health Canada; 1994. Screening for Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis; pp. 346–354.