Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 24:13:153.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-153.

Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study

Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study

Ingvild Vistad et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Most countries recommend planned cesarean section in breech deliveries, which is considered safer than vaginal delivery. As one of few countries in the western world Norway has continued to practice planned vaginal delivery in selected women. The aim of this study is to evaluate prospectively registered neonatal and maternal outcomes in term singleton breech deliveries in a Norwegian hospital during a ten years period. We aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in term breech pregnancies subjected either to planned vaginal or elective cesarean section.

Methods: A prospective registration study including 568 women with term breech deliveries (>37 weeks) consecutively registered at Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand between 2001 and 2011. Fetal and maternal outcomes were compared according to delivery method; planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean section.

Results: Of 568 women, elective cesarean section was planned in 279 (49%) cases and vaginal delivery was planned in 289 (51%) cases. Acute cesarean section was performed in 104 of the planned vaginal deliveries (36.3%). There were no neonatal deaths. Two cases of serious neonatal morbidity were reported in the planned vaginal group. One infant had seizures, brachial plexus injury, and cephalhematoma. The other infant had 5-minutes Apgar < 4. Twenty-nine in the planned vaginal group (10.0%) and eight in the planned cesarean section group (2.9%) (p < 0.001) were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit. However, only one infant was admitted for ≥4 days. According to follow-up data (median six years) none of these infants had long-term sequelae. Regarding maternal morbidity, blood loss was the only variable that was significantly higher in the planned cesarean section group versus in the vaginal delivery group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Strict guidelines were followed in all cases. There were no neonatal deaths. Two infants had serious neonatal morbidity in the planned vaginal group without long-term sequelae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG. Committee opinion: number 265, december 2001. Mode of term single breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:1189–1190. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01708-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van RJ, Rosendaal F. There is still room for disagreement about vaginal delivery of breech infants at term. BJOG. 2002;109:967–969. - PubMed
    1. Turner MJ. The term breech trial: are the clinical guidelines justified by the evidence? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:491–494. doi: 10.1080/01443610600797186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daviss BA, Johnson KC, Lalonde AB. Evolving evidence since the term breech trial: Canadian response, European dissent, and potential solutions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:217–224. - PubMed

MeSH terms