Assessment of dietary fish consumption in pregnancy: comparing one-, four- and thirty-six-item questionnaires
- PMID: 23883550
- PMCID: PMC4325983
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980013001985
Assessment of dietary fish consumption in pregnancy: comparing one-, four- and thirty-six-item questionnaires
Abstract
Objective: Fish consumption influences a number of health outcomes. Few studies have directly compared dietary assessment methods to determine the best approach to estimating intakes of fish and its component nutrients, including DHA, and toxicants, including methylmercury. Our objective was to compare three methods of assessing fish intake.
Design: We assessed 30 d fish intake using three approaches: (i) a single question on total fish consumption; (ii) a brief comprehensive FFQ that included four questions about fish; and (iii) a focused FFQ with thirty-six questions about different finfish and shellfish.
Setting: Obstetrics practices in Boston, MA, USA.
Subjects: Fifty-nine pregnant women who consumed ≤2 monthly fish servings.
Results: Estimated intakes of fish, DHA and Hg were lowest with the one-question screener and highest with the thirty-six-item fish questionnaire. Estimated intake of DHA with the thirty-six-item questionnaire was 4·4-fold higher (97 v. 22 mg/d), and intake of Hg was 3·8-fold higher (1·6 v. 0·42 μg/d), compared with the one-question screener. Plasma DHA concentration was correlated with fish intake assessed with the one-question screener (Spearman r = 0·27, P = 0·04), but not with the four-item FFQ (r = 0·08, P = 0·54) or the thirty-six-item fish questionnaire (r = 0·01, P = 0·93). In contrast, blood and hair Hg concentrations were similarly correlated with fish and Hg intakes regardless of the assessment method (r = 0·35 to 0·52).
Conclusions: A longer questionnaire provides no advantage over shorter questionnaires in ranking intakes of fish, DHA and Hg compared with biomarkers, but estimates of absolute intakes can vary by as much as fourfold across methods.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01126762.
Figures
References
-
- Nesheim M & Yaktine A (2007) Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
-
- Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP & Jeffries RA (2008) Methylmercury and omega-3 fatty acids: co-occurrence of dietary sources with emphasis on fish and shellfish. Environ Res 107, 20–29. - PubMed
-
- Debes F, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Weihe P et al. (2006) Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years. Neurotoxicol Teratol 28, 536–547. - PubMed
-
- Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C et al. (2003) Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study. Lancet 361, 1686–1692. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
