Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 2):435-436.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829ecb6a.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: optimizing use of this technology

Affiliations
Editorial

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: optimizing use of this technology

Marie Fidela R Paraiso et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Grabosch S, Xynos F. Isolated port-site metastasis after robotic hysterectomy for stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:437–39.
    1. Boes S, Mahdi H, Khoury F, Kebria MM. Peripartum robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy after second trimester pregnancy loss with placenta increta. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:440–43.
    1. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, et al.. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013;309:689–98.
    1. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012:120:604–11.
    1. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, et al.. Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Onocol 2012:30:695–700.

LinkOut - more resources