Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;69(11):1973-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1560-2. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Clinical relevance of information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics for dose adjustment in renal impairment

Affiliations

Clinical relevance of information in the Summaries of Product Characteristics for dose adjustment in renal impairment

Teresa M Salgado et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Information about dosing adjustments in patients with chronic kidney disease is important to avoid toxicity for several medicines. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical relevance of the instructions for dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment provided in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SmPCs) approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Methods: SmPCs available on the EMA website on April 2011 were retrieved, and information on the elimination route and instructions for use in renal impairment was analysed independently by two of the authors. SmPCs were classified as containing 'explicit' or 'poor' information based on whether they presented (or not) instructions for use of the medicine in renal impairment. Information was considered 'relevant' if SmPCs provided clear instructions for dose adjustment.

Results: Of the 356 SmPCs analysed, 13.8 and 37.4 % were classified as providing poor information and explicit but not relevant information, respectively. Only 48.8 % SmPCs provided both explicit and relevant information on medicine use in renal impairment. No difference was found in the average time since last update among SmPCs classified as containing explicit or poor information, as well as those classified as containing relevant or not relevant information. Also, no association was found between the clinical relevance of the information and whether or not the medication was an orphan drug, and 80 % SmPCs did not provide information on the use of the medicine in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Conclusions: Based on our analysis, current versions of SmPCs are characterised by several information deficits and by containing recommendations that are not relevant to clinical practice in terms of dose adjustment in renal impairment. These shortcomings might limit their usefulness for healthcare professionals and integration into clinical decision-making support systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):294-301 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;50(6):375-82 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):263 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1977 Apr;62(4):514-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):293 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources