Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 22:4:98.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00098. eCollection 2013.

Venocentric Lesions: An MRI Marker of MS?

Affiliations

Venocentric Lesions: An MRI Marker of MS?

Matthew P Quinn et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

From the earliest descriptions of multiple sclerosis (MS), the venocentric characteristic of plaques was noted. Recently, numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have proposed this finding as a prospective biomarker for MS, which might aid in differentiating MS from other diseases with similar MRI findings. High-field MRI studies have shown that penetrating veins can be detected in most MS lesions using T2(∗) weighted or susceptibility-weighted imaging. Future studies must address the feasibility of imaging such veins in a clinically practical context. The specificity of this biomarker has been studied only in a limited capacity. Results in microangiopathic lesions are conflicting, whereas asymptomatic white matter hyperintensities as well as lesions of neuromyelitis optica are less frequently venocentric compared to MS plaques. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of venocentric lesions at an early clinical presentation is highly predictive of future MS diagnosis. This is very promising, but work remains to be done to confirm or exclude lesions of common MS mimics, such as acute disseminate encephalomyelitis, as venocentric. A number of technical challenges must be addressed before the introduction of this technique as a complementary tool in current diagnostic procedures.

Keywords: T2∗ weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; susceptibility-weighted imaging; venocentric lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol (2011) 69:292–30210.1002/ana.22366 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eckstein C, Saidha S, Levy M. A differential diagnosis of central nervous system demyelination: beyond multiple sclerosis. J Neurol (2012) 259:801–1610.1007/s00415-011-6240-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, Fazekas F, et al. Mri and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of “no better explanation”. Lancet Neurol (2006) 5:841–5210.1016/S1474-4422(06)70572-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergamaschi R, Quaglini S, Tavazzi E, Amato MP, Paolicelli D, Zipoli V, et al. Immunomodulatory therapies delay disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler (2012):10.1177/1352458512445941 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charcot JM. Histologie de la sclèrose en plaque. Gaz Hop (1868) 41:554–5

LinkOut - more resources