Evidence on vulnerability and susceptibility to health risks associated with short-term exposure to particulate matter: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 23887042
- PMCID: PMC3775545
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt090
Evidence on vulnerability and susceptibility to health risks associated with short-term exposure to particulate matter: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Although there is strong evidence that short-term exposure to particulate matter is associated with health risks, less is known about whether some subpopulations face higher risks. We identified 108 papers published after 1995 and summarized the scientific evidence regarding effect modification of associations between short-term exposure to particulate matter and the risk of death or hospitalization. We performed a meta-analysis of estimated mortality associations by age and sex. We found strong, consistent evidence that the elderly experience higher risk of particular matter--associated hospitalization and death, weak evidence that women have higher risks of hospitalization and death, and suggestive evidence that those with lower education, income, or employment status have higher risk of death. Meta-analysis showed a statistically higher risk of death of 0.64% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.78) for older populations compared with 0.34% (95% CI: 0.25, 0.42) for younger populations per 10 μg/m3 increase of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm. Women had a slightly higher risk of death of 0.55% (95% CI: 0.41, 0.70) compared with 0.50% (95% CI: 0.34, 0.54) for men, but these 2 risks were not statistically different. Our synthesis on modifiers for risks associated with particulate matter can aid the design of air quality policies and suggest directions for future research. Studies of biological mechanisms could be informed by evidence of differential risks by population, such as by sex and preexisting conditions.
Keywords: PM10; PM2.5; age; effect modifiers; hospital admissions; mortality; particulate matter; socioeconomic status.
Figures
References
-
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2011.
-
- US Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2012. The Green Book nonattainment areas for criteria pollutants http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk/index.html. (Accessed August 21, 2012)
-
- Katsouyanni K, Samet JM, Anderson HR, et al. Air pollution and health: a European and North American approach (APHENA) Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009;)(142):5–90. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01ES016317/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R21 ES022585/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R21 ES021427/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R21 ES020152/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 ES019560/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 ES019955/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R21ES021427/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 ES019587/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01ES019955/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R21ES020152/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01ES019587/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01 ES016317/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
- R01ES019560/ES/NIEHS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
