Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Aug 20;109(4):827-35.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.416. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Technical and implementation issues in using next-generation sequencing of cancers in clinical practice

Affiliations
Review

Technical and implementation issues in using next-generation sequencing of cancers in clinical practice

D Ulahannan et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cancer genomes promises to revolutionise oncology, with the ability to design and use targeted drugs, to predict outcome and response, and to classify tumours. It is continually becoming cheaper, faster and more reliable, with the capability to identify rare yet clinically important somatic mutations. Technical challenges include sequencing samples of low quality and/or quantity, reliable identification of structural and copy number variation, and assessment of intratumour heterogeneity. Once these problems are overcome, the use of the data to guide clinical decision making is not straightforward, and there is a risk of premature use of molecular changes to guide patient management in the absence of supporting evidence. Paradoxically, NGS may simply move the bottleneck of personalised medicine from data acquisition to the identification of reliable biomarkers. Standardised cancer NGS data collection on an international scale would be a significant step towards optimising patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Framework for cancer genome analysis using NGS.

References

    1. Albers CA, Lunter G, MacArthur DG, McVean G, Ouwehand WH, Durbin R. Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data. Genome Res. 2011;21:961–973. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bao S, Jiang R, Kwan W. Evaluation of next generation sequencing software in mapping and assembly. J Hum Genet. 2011;56 (6:406–414. - PubMed
    1. Birol I, Jackman SD, Nielsen CB, Quian JQ, Varhol R, Stazyk G, Morin RD, Zhao Y, Hirst M, Schein JE, Hormans DE, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Marra MA, Jones SJ. De novo transcriptome assembly with ABySS. Bioinformatics. 2009;25 (21:2872–2877. - PubMed
    1. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, Dummer R, Garbe C, Testori A, Maio M, Hogg D, Lorigan P, Lebbe C, Jouary T, Schadendorf D, Ribas A, O'Day SJ, Sosman JA, Kirkwood JM, Eggermont AM, Dreno B, Nolop K, Li J, Nelson B, Hou J, Lee RJ, Flaherty KT, McArthur GA. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–2516. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen K, Wallis JW, McLellan MD, Larson DE, Kalicki JM, Pohl CS, McGrath SD, Wendl MC, Zhang Q, Locke DP, Shi X, Fulton RS, Ley TJ, Wilson RK, Ding L, Mardis ER. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resloution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat Methods. 2009;6:677–681. - PMC - PubMed