Readmissions and deaths following ICU discharge: a challenge for intensive care
- PMID: 23887757
- PMCID: PMC4031865
- DOI: 10.1590/s0103-507x2013000100007
Readmissions and deaths following ICU discharge: a challenge for intensive care
Abstract
Objectives: Identify patients at risk for intensive care unit readmission, the reasons for and rates of readmission, and mortality after their stay in the intensive care unit; describe the sensitivity and specificity of the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer scale as a criterion for discharge from the intensive care unit.
Methods: Adult, critical patients from intensive care units from two public hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil, comprised the sample. The patients' clinical and demographic characteristics were collected within 24 hours of admission. They were monitored until their final outcome on the intensive care unit (death or discharge) to apply the Stability and Workload Index for Transfer. The deaths during the first intensive care unit admission were disregarded, and we continued monitoring the other patients using the hospitals' electronic systems to identify the discharges, deaths, and readmissions.
Results: Readmission rates were 13.7% in intensive care unit 1 (medical-surgical, ICU1) and 9.3% in intensive care unit 2 (trauma and neurosurgery, ICU2). The death rate following discharge was 12.5% from ICU1 and 4.2% from ICU2. There was a statistically significant difference in Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (p<0.05) regarding the ICU1 patients' outcome, which was not found in the ICU2 patients. In ICU1, 46.5% (N=20) of patients were readmitted very early (within 48 hours of discharge). Mortality was high among those readmitted: 69.7% in ICU1 and 48.5% in ICU2.
Conclusions: The Stability and Workload Index for Transfer scale showed greater efficacy in identifying patients more prone to readmission and death following discharge from a medical-surgical intensive care unit. The patients' intensive care unit readmission during the same hospitalization resulted in increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and total costs.
Objetivo: Identificar os pacientes com risco de retornar à unidade de terapia intensiva, os motivos e as taxas de readmissão, e a mortalidade após a estadia na unidade de terapia intensiva; além de descrever a sensibilidade e a especificidade da escala Stability and Workload Index for Transfer como critério de alta da unidade de terapia intensiva.
Métodos: Pacientes adultos críticos de unidades de terapia intensiva de dois hospitais públicos de Porto Alegre (RS) compuseram a amostra. Nas primeiras 24 horas de internação, foram obtidas informações clínicas e demográficas dos pacientes. Eles eram monitorados até seu destino final na unidade de terapia intensiva (óbito ou alta) para a realização do Stability and Workload Index for Transfer. Os óbitos durante a primeira admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva foram desconsiderados, seguindo-se com o acompanhamento dos demais pacientes, pelo sistema eletrônico dos hospitais, para a identificação das altas, óbitos e readmissões.
Resultados: As taxas de readmissão foram 13,7% na unidade de terapia intensiva 1 - clínica cirúrgica (UTI1) e 9,3% na unidade de terapia intensiva 2 - trauma e neurocirurgia (UTI2); as mortes após a alta da unidade de terapia intensiva foram 12,5% na UTI1 1 e 4,2% na UTI2. Houve diferença estatística significativa do Stability and Workload Index for Transfer (p<0,05) nos pacientes da UTI1 em relação ao desfecho, o que não se repetiu nos da UTI2. Na UTI1 46,5% (N=20) dos pacientes foram readmitidos de forma precoce (em menos de 48 horas de alta). A mortalidade entre os readmitidos foi alta, 69,7% (UTI1) e 48,5% (UTI2).
Conclusão: A escala Stability and Workload Index for Transfer apresentou maior eficácia em reconhecer os pacientes mais propensos à readmissão e a óbitos após a alta em uma unidade de terapia intensiva clínica-cirúrgica. A readmissão dos pacientes na unidade de terapia intensiva, durante a mesma hospitalização, resultou em aumento da morbidade e mortalidade, de tempo de permanência e de custos totais.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Risk Factors, Resource Use, and Outcomes. A Retrospective Cohort Study.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1312-1319. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-851OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. PMID: 28530118
-
Predictive ability of the stability and workload index for transfer score to predict unplanned readmissions after ICU discharge.Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1608-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a217b. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23660731
-
The Stability and Workload Index for Transfer score predicts unplanned intensive care unit patient readmission: initial development and validation.Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):676-82. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318164E3B0. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18431260
-
A meta-analysis to derive literature-based benchmarks for readmission and hospital mortality after patient discharge from intensive care.Crit Care. 2014 Dec 31;18(6):715. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0715-6. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 25551448 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transition of care at discharge from the Intensive Care Unit: a scoping review.Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3325. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4008.3325. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020. PMID: 32696919 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Importance of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit.Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Aug 26;50(5):1203-1209. doi: 10.3906/sag-1906-78. Turk J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 32659876 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic impact of the time of admission and discharge from the intensive care unit.Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):63-69. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170010. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017. PMID: 28444074 Free PMC article.
-
Modified Early Warning Score as a predictor of intensive care unit readmission within 48 hours: a retrospective observational study.Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Jun;32(2):301-307. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200047. Epub 2020 Jul 13. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020. PMID: 32667433 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence, risk and impact of ICU readmission on patient outcomes and resource utilisation in tertiary level ICUs in Nepal: A cohort study.Wellcome Open Res. 2025 Feb 24;7:272. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18381.3. eCollection 2022. Wellcome Open Res. 2025. PMID: 40170883 Free PMC article.
-
A Machine Learning Based Discharge Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases Patients in Intensive Care Units.Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 24;10(6):966. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10060966. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35742018 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosenberg AL, Watts C. Patients readmitted to ICUs: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Chest. 2000;118(2):492–502. - PubMed
-
- Durbin CG Jr, Kopel R. A case-control study of patients readmitted to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(10):1547–1553. - PubMed
-
- Franklin C, Jackson D. Discharge decision-making in a medical ICU: characteristics of unexpected readmissions . Crit Care Med. 1983;11(2):61–66. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg AL, Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Strachan C, Watts CM. Who bounces back? Physiologic and other predictors of intensive care unit readmission. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(3):511–518. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources