Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;15(9):733-47.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.92. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing

Affiliations

ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing

Heidi L Rehm et al. Genet Med. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing technologies have been and continue to be deployed in clinical laboratories, enabling rapid transformations in genomic medicine. These technologies have reduced the cost of large-scale sequencing by several orders of magnitude, and continuous advances are being made. It is now feasible to analyze an individual's near-complete exome or genome to assist in the diagnosis of a wide array of clinical scenarios. Next-generation sequencing technologies are also facilitating further advances in therapeutic decision making and disease prediction for at-risk patients. However, with rapid advances come additional challenges involving the clinical validation and use of these constantly evolving technologies and platforms in clinical laboratories. To assist clinical laboratories with the validation of next-generation sequencing methods and platforms, the ongoing monitoring of next-generation sequencing testing to ensure quality results, and the interpretation and reporting of variants found using these technologies, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has developed the following professional standards and guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Next-generation sequencing involves three major components: sample preparation, sequencing, and data analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Next-generation sequencing test development and validation process. CNV, copy-number variant; in/dels, insertions and deletions; sample prep, sample preparation.

References

    1. Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA, Hateley SL, Ganusova EE, Mudge J, Langley RJ, Zhang L, Lee CC, Schilkey FD, Sheth V, Woodward JE, Peckham HE, Schroth GP, Kim RW, Kingsmore SF. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. SciTransl Med. 2011 Jan 12;3(65):65ra4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen B, Gagnon M, Shahangian S, Anderson NL, Howerton DA, Boone JD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Good laboratory practices for molecular genetic testing for heritable diseases and conditions. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jun 12;58(RR-6):1–37. - PubMed
    1. Cirulli ET, Singh A, Shianna KV, Ge D, Smith JP, Maia JM, Heinzen EL, Goedert JJ, Goldstein DB, Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) Screening the human exome: a comparison of whole genome and whole transcriptome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2010;11(5):R57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark MJ, Chen R, Lam HY, Karczewski KJ, Chen R, Euskirchen G, Butte AJ, Snyder M. Performance comparison of exome DNA sequencing technologies. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Sep 25;29(10):908–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell TJ, Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011 May;43(5):491–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types