Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 26;9(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-30.

Global health initiative investments and health systems strengthening: a content analysis of global fund investments

Affiliations

Global health initiative investments and health systems strengthening: a content analysis of global fund investments

Ashley E Warren et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

Background: Millions of dollars are invested annually under the umbrella of national health systems strengthening. Global health initiatives provide funding for low- and middle-income countries through disease-oriented programmes while maintaining that the interventions simultaneously strengthen systems. However, it is as yet unclear which, and to what extent, system-level interventions are being funded by these initiatives, nor is it clear how much funding they allocate to disease-specific activities - through conventional 'vertical-programming' approach. Such funding can be channelled to one or more of the health system building blocks while targeting disease(s) or explicitly to system-wide activities.

Methods: We operationalized the World Health Organization health system framework of the six building blocks to conduct a detailed assessment of Global Fund health system investments. Our application of this framework framework provides a comprehensive quantification of system-level interventions. We applied this systematically to a random subset of 52 of the 139 grants funded in Round 8 of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (totalling approximately US$1 billion).

Results: According to the analysis, 37% (US$ 362 million) of the Global Fund Round 8 funding was allocated to health systems strengthening. Of that, 38% (US$ 139 million) was for generic system-level interventions, rather than disease-specific system support. Around 82% of health systems strengthening funding (US$ 296 million) was allocated to service delivery, human resources, and medicines & technology, and within each of these to two to three interventions. Governance, financing, and information building blocks received relatively low funding.

Conclusions: This study shows that a substantial portion of Global Fund's Round 8 funds was devoted to health systems strengthening. Dramatic skewing among the health system building blocks suggests opportunities for more balanced investments with regard to governance, financing, and information system related interventions. There is also a need for agreement, by researchers, recipients, and donors, on keystone interventions that have the greatest system-level impacts for the cost-effective use of funds. Effective health system strengthening depends on inter-agency collaboration and country commitment along with concerted partnership among all the stakeholders working in the health system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision tree used in classification of each budgeted activity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Resource allocation profile of HSS and Non-HSS activities. Sub-set absolute values- Overall $1.1 billion; Disease-specific HSS $223 million; System-wide HSS $184 million; Grant Management $66 million; Salary / Per Diem $67 million; Commodities, Diagnostics, and Drugs $358 million; and Unclassified $129 million.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Resource allocation profile of WHO building blocks. Sub-set absolute values- Total HSS $463 million; Governance $19 million; Financing $4 million; Information $44 million; Human Resources $82 million; Medicines and Technology $101 million; and Service Delivery $112 million.

References

    1. Caines K. Background Paper: Key Evidence from Major Studies of Selected Global Health Partnerships. London, U.K: DFID Health Resource Centre; 2005. (High Level Forum on the Health MDGs). Ref Type: Report.
    1. Samb B, Evans T, Dybul M, Atun R, Moatti JP, Nishtar S. et al. An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems. Lancet. 2009;373:2137–2169. - PubMed
    1. Brugha R, Donoghue M, Starling M, Ndubani P, Ssengooba F, Fernandes B. et al. The Global Fund: managing great expectations. Lancet. 2004;364:95–100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16595-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buse K, Waxman A. Public-private health partnerships: a strategy for WHO. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:748–754. - PMC - PubMed
    1. High-Level Forum on the Health Millennium Development Goals. Best Practice Principles for Global Health Partnership Activities at Country Level. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005.

MeSH terms