Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Aug;39(2):48-56.
doi: 10.1111/aej.12002. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study

Till Dammaschke et al. Aust Endod J. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

To evaluate the influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, 676 root canal-filled and restored posterior teeth were evaluated after a mean period of 9.7 (± 2.8; minimum: 5) years. A total of 86.2% of the endodontically treated and restored teeth survived the mean observation period of 9.7 years without fracture. The overall survival period was 13.6 (± 0.2) years. All teeth with gold partial crowns survived without fractures (n = 24). Teeth with crowns and adhesively sealed access cavities showed a mean survival period of 15.3 (± 0.4) years, with crown and bridge restorations 14.0 (± 0.3), with individual metal posts 13.9 (± 0.2), with composite fillings 13.4 (± 0.5), with prefabricated metal posts 12.7 (± 0.6), with amalgam fillings 11.8 (± 0.6) and with glass ionomer cements (GIC) 6.6 (± 0.5) years. Teeth with one or two surfaces restored by amalgam, composite or GIC showed a significantly lower fracture rate than teeth with three and more restored surfaces (P < 0.05). The mean fracture rate of teeth restored with GIC was significantly higher when compared with all other groups (P < 0.001). In general, endodontically treated teeth restored with prosthetic restorations demonstrated a significantly lower mean fracture rate than teeth restored with fillings. Cavities with up to three surfaces may well be successfully restored adhesively with composite filling material.

Keywords: coronal restoration; fracture resistance; post-endodontic restoration; root canal treatment; survival rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources