An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments
- PMID: 23890275
- DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12075
An in vitro comparison of shear bond strength of zirconia to enamel using different surface treatments
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strength of an airborne-particle abraded zirconia, an acid-etched zirconia (Piranha solution), an Alloy Primer treated zirconia, and a silaned zirconia to enamel, all bonded with a phosphate-methacrylate resin luting agent.
Materials and methods: Seventy extracted intact human molars were collected, cleaned, and mounted in autopolymerizing acrylic resin, with the experimental surface of the teeth exposed. The specimens were randomly divided into seven groups of zirconia specimens (4 mm diameter, 2 mm thick). Group 1: Airborne-particle abrasion; group 2: Airborne-particle abrasion and Z-PRIME Plus; group 3: Airborne-particle abrasion and alloy primer; group 4: Piranha solution 7:1; group 5: Piranha solution 7:1 and Z-PRIME Plus; group 6: Piranha solution 7:1 and Alloy primer; group 7: CoJet and silane. All specimens were luted with a phosphate-methacrylate resin luting agent (Panavia F2.0) and stored in distilled water for 1 day, then thermocycled (5°C and 55°C) for 500 cycles and tested for shear bond strength (SBS), measured in MPa, with a universal testing machine at a 0.55 mm/min crosshead speed. All specimens were inspected under a scanning electron microscope to determine mode of failure. The mean values and standard deviations of all specimens were calculated for each group. A one-way ANOVA was performed, and multiple pairwise comparisons were then completed with post hoc Tukey test (alpha = 0.05).
Results: The airborne-particle abrasion and Z-PRIME Plus group resulted in a significantly higher SBS than the other groups (21.11 ± 6.32 MPa) (p < 0.001). The CoJet and silane group (15.99 ± 8.92 MPa) and airborne-particle abrasion and alloy primer group (11.07 ± 4.34 MPa) showed high shear bond strength but not statistically significant from the airborne-particle abrasion group (14.23 ± 5.68 MPa). Failure mode was predominately mixed in groups 1, 2, 3, and 7 with islands of retained resin on the zirconia and enamel surfaces; however, groups 4, 5, and 6 showed mostly adhesive failures, which left the zirconia surface free of the adhesive materials. No cohesive failures of the substrates (ceramic, resin, or enamel) were observed.
Conclusion: Airborne-particle abrasion followed by the application of a zirconia primer produced the highest bond strength to enamel. Therefore, it can be recommended as a promising surface treatment method to achieve a durable bond to densely sintered zirconia ceramics.
Keywords: Airborne-particle abrasion; SEM; acid etch; mode of failure; self-adhesive resin cement; thermocycling; universal testing machine; zirconia primer.
© 2013 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Similar articles
-
Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 May;99(5):388-99. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60088-8. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18456050
-
Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jun;95(6):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.016. J Prosthet Dent. 2006. PMID: 16765155
-
Can application of universal primers alone be a substitute for airborne-particle abrasion to improve adhesion of resin cement to zirconia?J Adhes Dent. 2015 Apr;17(2):169-74. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33974. J Adhes Dent. 2015. PMID: 25969840
-
Is zirconia surface etching a viable alternative to airborne particle abrasion? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.J Dent. 2024 Dec;151:105394. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105394. Epub 2024 Oct 5. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 39374733
-
Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):7-26. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33525. J Adhes Dent. 2015. PMID: 25646166
Cited by
-
Adhesive bond strength of monolithic zirconia ceramic finished with various surface treatments.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03630-7. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37957657 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Piranha Solution as An Alternative Route to Promote Bioactivation of PEEK Surface with Low Functionalization Times.Molecules. 2022 Dec 22;28(1):74. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010074. Molecules. 2022. PMID: 36615270 Free PMC article.
-
Surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic in the adhesion to the resin cement.Braz Dent J. 2024 Mar 22;35:e245674. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405674. eCollection 2024. Braz Dent J. 2024. PMID: 38537020 Free PMC article.
-
Resin cementation of zirconia ceramics with different bonding agents.Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Mar 4;29(2):363-367. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.996606. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015. PMID: 26019653 Free PMC article.
-
Alumina and glass-bead blasting effect on bond strength of zirconia using 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) containing self-adhesive resin cement and primers.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 5;13(1):19127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46548-4. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37926736 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous