Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;78(6):854-864.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention: outcomes of a single tertiary-care referral center experience

Affiliations

EUS-guided pancreatic duct intervention: outcomes of a single tertiary-care referral center experience

Larissa L Fujii et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Background: EUS can provide access to the main pancreatic duct (MPD) for therapeutic intervention. The long-term clinical success of EUS-guided MPD interventions is unknown.

Objective: To determine technical and clinical success rates, predictors of success, and long-term outcomes of EUS-guided MPD intervention.

Design: Retrospective, single-center study.

Setting: Tertiary-care referral center.

Patients: Forty-five patients.

Intervention: EUS-guided MPD stent retrieval or placement.

Main outcome measurements: Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, and long-term clinical outcomes.

Results: Among the 45 patients, 37 had undergone failed ERCP, and 29 had surgically altered anatomy. Median follow-up after initial EUS-guided intervention was 23 months. Two patients underwent EUS for stent removal, and EUS-guided MPD stent placement was attempted in 43 patients. Technical success was achieved in 32 of 43 patients (74%) with antegrade (n = 18) or retrograde (n = 14) stent insertion. Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (6%). Patients underwent a median of 2 (range 1-6) follow-up procedures for revision or removal of stents, without adverse events. Complete symptom resolution occurred in 24 of 29 patients (83%) while stents were in place, including all 6 with nondilated ducts. Stents were removed in 23 patients, who were then followed for an additional median of 32 months; 4 patients had recurrent symptoms. Among the 11 failed cases, most had persistent symptoms or required surgery.

Limitations: Retrospective study design, individualized patient management.

Conclusion: EUS-guided MPD intervention is feasible and safe, with long-term clinical success in the majority of patients. EUS provides important treatment options, particularly in patients who would otherwise undergo surgery.

Keywords: ERP; MPD; endoscopic retrograde pancreatography; main pancreatic duct.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources