Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 19;8(7):e70404.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070404. Print 2013.

Preference for cannibalism and ontogenetic constraints in competitive ability of piscivorous top predators

Affiliations

Preference for cannibalism and ontogenetic constraints in competitive ability of piscivorous top predators

Pär Byström et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Occurrence of cannibalism and inferior competitive ability of predators compared to their prey have been suggested to promote coexistence in size-structured intraguild predation (IGP) systems. The intrinsic size-structure of fish provides the necessary prerequisites to test whether the above mechanisms are general features of species interactions in fish communities where IGP is common. We first experimentally tested whether Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) were more efficient as a cannibal than as an interspecific predator on the prey fish ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) and whether ninespine stickleback were a more efficient competitor on the shared zooplankton prey than its predator, Arctic char. Secondly, we performed a literature survey to evaluate if piscivores in general are more efficient as cannibals than as interspecific predators and whether piscivores are inferior competitors on shared resources compared to their prey fish species. Both controlled pool experiments and outdoor pond experiments showed that char imposed a higher mortality on YOY char than on ninespine sticklebacks, suggesting that piscivorous char is a more efficient cannibal than interspecific predator. Estimates of size dependent attack rates on zooplankton further showed a consistently higher attack rate of ninespine sticklebacks compared to similar sized char on zooplankton, suggesting that ninespine stickleback is a more efficient competitor than char on zooplankton resources. The literature survey showed that piscivorous top consumers generally selected conspecifics over interspecific prey, and that prey species are competitively superior compared to juvenile piscivorous species in the zooplankton niche. We suggest that the observed selectivity for cannibal prey over interspecific prey and the competitive advantage of prey species over juvenile piscivores are common features in fish communities and that the observed selectivity for cannibalism over interspecific prey has the potential to mediate coexistence in size structured intraguild predation systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of consumed prey (small char and/or nine spine stickleback) in the different treatments in the pool experiment.
* No (0) sticklebacks were consumed in the sympatric treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Attack rate (m3 day−1±1SD) of piscivorous char when feeding on small char and/or ninespine sticklebacks.
Circles denote singles prey species treatments and triangles mix prey species treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Attack rate (l s−1±1SE) of char (obtained from [31]) and ninespine stickleback when feeding on zooplankton (Daphnia sp.).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Persson L (1988) Asymmetries in competitive and predatory interactions in fish populations. pages 203–218 in: Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution (eds. B. Ebenman & L. Persson). Heidelberg, Springer.
    1. Smith C, Reay P (1991) Cannibalism in teleost fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 1: 41–64.
    1. Claessen D, de Roos AM, Persson L (2004) Population dynamic theory of size-dependent cannibalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271: 333–340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudolf VHW (2007) The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology 88: 2697–2705. - PubMed
    1. Rudolf VHW (2008) Impact of cannibalism on predator-prey dynamics: Size-structured interactions and apparent mutualism. Ecology 89: 1650–1660. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources