Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Jul 30:13:22.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-22.

Exposure of the Swiss population to computed tomography

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Exposure of the Swiss population to computed tomography

Abbas Aroua et al. BMC Med Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: The frequency of CT procedures has registered a significant increase over the last decade, which led at the international level to an increasing concern on the radiological risk associated with the use of CT especially in paediatrics. This work aimed at investigating the use of computed tomography in Switzerland, following the evolution of CT frequency and dose data over a decade and comparing it to data reported in other countries.

Methods: The frequency and dose data related to CT are obtained by means of a nationwide survey. National frequencies were established by projecting the collected data, using the ratio of the number of CT units belonging to the respondents to the total number of CT units in the country. The effective doses per examination were collected during an auditing campaign.

Results: In 2008 about 0.8 Million CT procedures (~100 CT examinations/1000 population) were performed in the country, leading to a collective effective dose of more than 6000 man.Sv (0.8 mSv/caput). In a decade the frequency of CT examinations averaged over the population and the associated average effective dose per caput increased by a factor of 2.2 and 2.9 respectively.

Conclusions: Although the contribution of CT to the total medical X-rays is 6% in terms of the frequency, it represents 68% in terms of the collective effective dose. These results are comparable to those reported in a number of countries in Europe and America with similar health level.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR Report 2008: Sources of Ionizing Radiation. New York: United Nations; 2010.
    1. Federal Office of Public Health. 2009 Annual Report of the Radiological Protection Division. Bern: FOPH; 2010.
    1. Mini RL. Dosisbestimmungen in der medizinischen Röntgendiagnostik. Kerzers: Verlag Max Huber; 1992.
    1. Aroua A, Burnand B, Decka I, Vader JP, Valley JF. Nationwide survey on radiation doses in diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland in 1998. Health Phys. 2002;83(1):46–55. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200207000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aroua A, Decka I, Burnand B, Vader JP, Valley JF. Dosimetric aspects of a national survey of diagnostic and interventional radiology in Switzerland. Medical Phys. 2002;29(10):2247–2259. doi: 10.1118/1.1508380. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms