Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;33(7):737-47.
doi: 10.1037/a0033186. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Randomized trial of a presurgical scheduled reduced smoking intervention for patients newly diagnosed with cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial of a presurgical scheduled reduced smoking intervention for patients newly diagnosed with cancer

Jamie S Ostroff et al. Health Psychol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Cancer patients who smoke are advised to quit smoking to reduce treatment complications and future cancer risk. This study's main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel, presurgical cessation intervention in newly diagnosed cancer patients scheduled for surgical hospitalization.

Method: We conducted a parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of our hospital-based, tobacco cessation "best practices" treatment model (BP; cessation counseling and nicotine replacement therapy) with BP enhanced by a behavioral tapering regimen (scheduled reduced smoking; BP + SRS) administered by a handheld computer before hospitalization for surgery. Cessation outcomes were short (hospital admission and 3 months) and longer-term (6 months) biochemically verified smoking abstinence. We hypothesized that BP + SRS would be superior to BP alone. One hundred eighty-five smokers were enrolled.

Results: Overall, 7-day-point prevalence, confirmed abstinence rates at 6 months for BP alone (32%) and BP + SRS (32%) were high; however, no main effect of treatment was observed. Patients who were older and diagnosed with lung cancer were more likely to quit smoking.

Conclusion: Compared to best practices for treating tobacco dependence, a presurgical, scheduled reduced smoking intervention did not improve abstinence rates among newly diagnosed cancer patients.reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CONSORT flow diagram of the BP vs BP+SRS intervention for cancer patients scheduled for hospitalization for cancer surgery

References

    1. American Society for Clinical Oncology. Tobacco cessation and quality cancer care. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2009;5(1):2–5. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0913501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer JS, Lichtenstein E. Classification and prediction of smoking relapse episodes: an exploration of individual differences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988;56(1):104–110. - PubMed
    1. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, Czajkowski S. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology. 2004;23(5):443–451. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg CJ, Carpenter MJ, Jardin B, Ostroff JS. Harm reduction and cessation efforts and interest in cessation resources among survivors of smoking-related cancers. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0243-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catley D, Grobe JE. Using basic laboratory research to understand scheduled smoking: a field investigation of the effects of manipulating controllability on subjective responses to smoking. Health Psychology. 2008;27(3 suppl):S189–S196. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3(Suppl.).S189. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types