Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Oct;21(10):1474-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

Cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time as non-invasive biomarker for knee osteoarthritis and cartilage repair procedures

Affiliations
Review

Cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time as non-invasive biomarker for knee osteoarthritis and cartilage repair procedures

T Baum et al. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this work was to review the current literature on cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time.

Methods: Electronic searches in PubMed were performed to identify relevant studies about T2 relaxation time measurements as non-invasive biomarker for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and cartilage repair procedures.

Results: Initial osteoarthritic changes include proteoglycan loss, deterioration of the collagen network, and increased water content within the articular cartilage and menisci. T2 relaxation time measurements are affected by these pathophysiological processes. It was demonstrated that cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time values were significantly increased in subjects with compared to those without radiographic OA and focal knee lesions, respectively. Subjects with OA risk factors such as overweight/obesity showed significantly greater cartilage T2 values than normal controls. Elevated cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation times were found in subjects with vs without knee pain. Increased cartilage T2 at baseline predicted morphologic degeneration in the cartilage, meniscus, and bone marrow over 3 years. Furthermore, cartilage repair tissue could be non-invasively assessed by using T2 mapping. Reproducibility errors for T2 measurements were reported to be smaller than the T2 differences in healthy and diseased cartilage indicating that T2 relaxation time may be a reliable discriminatory biomarker.

Conclusions: Cartilage and meniscal T2 mapping may be suitable as non-invasive biomarker to diagnose early stages of knee OA and to monitor therapy of OA.

Keywords: Cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative color-coded, sagittal T2 maps with segmented PAT, TRO, LF, and LT compartments in A, and MF and MT compartments in B. A sagittal 2D MSME SE sequence was used for T2 mapping (TR of 2700 m; seven TEs of 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms, 40 ms, 50 ms, 60 ms, and 70 ms; slice thickness of 3 mm with 0.5 mm gap, in-plane spatial resolution of 0.313 × 0.446 mm2, acquisition time of 10.6 min).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative color-coded, sagittal T2 maps with segmented anterior horn (AH) and posterior horn (PH) of the medial meniscus in A, and segmented body of medial meniscus in B. A nonselective T2 preparation and a 3D SPGR acquisition during the transient signal evolving towards steady state was used for T2 mapping (TR of 2000 ms; four TEs of 4.1 ms, 14.5 ms, 25.0 ms, and 45.9 ms; slice thickness of 3 mm; in-plane spatial resolution of 0.547 × 0.729 mm2, acquisition time of 10.6 min).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative color-coded, sagittal T2 maps with segmented MF and MT compartments of a normal control (A) and a subject with the OA risk factor obesity (B). Note the elevated cartilage T2 values in the obese subject compared to the normal control. A sagittal 2D multi-slice multi-echo (MSME) SE sequence was used for T2 mapping (TR of 2700 m; seven TEs of 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms, 40 ms, 50 ms, 60 ms, and 70 ms; slice thickness of 3 mm with 0.5 mm gap, in-plane spatial resolution of 0.313 × 0.446 mm2, acquisition time of 10.6 min).

References

    1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, McDougall JJ, Keefe FJ. The symptoms of osteoar-thritis and the genesis of pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34:623–643. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu CR, Williams AA, Coyle CH, Bowers ME. Early diagnosis to enable early treatment of pre-osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:212. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Zhang W, Conaghan PG, Hirko K, Menashe L, Li L, et al. Systematic review of the concurrent and predictive validity of MRI biomarkers in OA. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19:557–588. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dijkgraaf LC, de Bont LG, Boering G, Liem RS. Normal cartilage structure, biochemistry, and metabolism: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53:924–929. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms