Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar:147:80-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes

Affiliations

Reinforcement probability modulates temporal memory selection and integration processes

Matthew S Matell et al. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar.

Abstract

We have previously shown that rats trained in a mixed-interval peak procedure (tone=4s, light=12s) respond in a scalar manner at a time in between the trained peak times when presented with the stimulus compound (Swanton & Matell, 2011). In our previous work, the two component cues were reinforced with different probabilities (short=20%, long=80%) to equate response rates, and we found that the compound peak time was biased toward the cue with the higher reinforcement probability. Here, we examined the influence that different reinforcement probabilities have on the temporal location and shape of the compound response function. We found that the time of peak responding shifted as a function of the relative reinforcement probability of the component cues, becoming earlier as the relative likelihood of reinforcement associated with the short cue increased. However, as the relative probabilities of the component cues grew dissimilar, the compound peak became non-scalar, suggesting that the temporal control of behavior shifted from a process of integration to one of selection. As our previous work has utilized durations and reinforcement probabilities more discrepant than those used here, these data suggest that the processes underlying the integration/selection decision for time are based on cue value.

Keywords: Multimodal; Rats; Time perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average peak functions for the short, compound, and long cues across modality-duration groups (columns) and reinforcement probability groups (rows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative spread, peak rate, asymmetry, and times of half-maximal responding as a function of modality-duration relationship (columns), and reinforcement probability (abscissa).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Average peak functions for the short (tone), compound, and long (light) cues as a function of the reinforcement probability of the long cue (rows).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative spread, peak rate, asymmetry, and times of half-maximal responding as a function of the reinforcement probability (abscissa).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balci F, Freestone D, Gallistel CR. Risk assessment in man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(7):2459–2463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812709106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2. New York: Springer; 2002.
    1. Chamizo VD, Rodrigo T, MacKintosh NJ. Spatial integration with rats. Learning & Behavior. 2006;34(4):348–354. - PubMed
    1. Cheng K. A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition. 1986;23(2):149–178. - PubMed
    1. Cheng K. The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 1989;15(4):366–375.

Publication types