Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Sep;120(3):638-48.
doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90022-p.

Noninvasive evaluation of the magnitude of aortic and mitral regurgitation by means of Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Noninvasive evaluation of the magnitude of aortic and mitral regurgitation by means of Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography

S Kurokawa et al. Am Heart J. 1990 Sep.

Abstract

Using transmitral flow velocity and left ventricular ejection flow velocity, we measured left ventricular inflow volume (LVIV) and left ventricular outflow volume (LVOV) by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 73 patients who had mitral valve regurgitation (MR), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), or no valvular regurgitation. Doppler-determined regurgitant volume (DOPRV), Doppler-determined regurgitant fraction (DOPRF), total stoke volume, and forward stroke volume were calculated to compare the severity assessed by angiographic scoring and the regurgitant fraction determined by radionuclide angiography (RIRF). In 17 patients with MR, LVIV (84.4 +/- 20.4 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVOV (52.5 +/- 15.7 ml). LVOV, which is equivalent to forward stroke volume, was lower in patients with MR (52.2 +/- 15.7 ml) than in normal subjects (67.0 +/- 15.7 ml). In 15 patients with AR, LVOV (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVIV (75.1 +/- 28.1 ml) and LVOV, which is equivalent to total stroke volume, was greater in patients with AR (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) than in normal subjects (64.0 +/- 14.4 ml). DOPRF correlated with RIRF (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01, n = 11). DOPRV (mild: 10.5 +/- 8.5 ml; moderate: 28.8 +/- 13.6 ml; severe: 74.5 +/- 36.7 ml) and DOPRF (mild: 13.7% +/- 11.5%; moderate: 33.1% +/- 14.2%; severe: 52.6% +/- 15.3%) increased markedly with the severity of regurgitation as assessed by cineangiography. In AR, total stroke volume influenced both forward stroke volume and regurgitant volume, and in MR, regurgitant volume influenced both total stroke volume and forward stroke volume. Total stroke volume in AR and regurgitant volume in MR may play a key role in valvular regurgitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources