Noninvasive evaluation of the magnitude of aortic and mitral regurgitation by means of Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography
- PMID: 2389699
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90022-p
Noninvasive evaluation of the magnitude of aortic and mitral regurgitation by means of Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography
Abstract
Using transmitral flow velocity and left ventricular ejection flow velocity, we measured left ventricular inflow volume (LVIV) and left ventricular outflow volume (LVOV) by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 73 patients who had mitral valve regurgitation (MR), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), or no valvular regurgitation. Doppler-determined regurgitant volume (DOPRV), Doppler-determined regurgitant fraction (DOPRF), total stoke volume, and forward stroke volume were calculated to compare the severity assessed by angiographic scoring and the regurgitant fraction determined by radionuclide angiography (RIRF). In 17 patients with MR, LVIV (84.4 +/- 20.4 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVOV (52.5 +/- 15.7 ml). LVOV, which is equivalent to forward stroke volume, was lower in patients with MR (52.2 +/- 15.7 ml) than in normal subjects (67.0 +/- 15.7 ml). In 15 patients with AR, LVOV (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) was significantly greater (p less than 0.01) than LVIV (75.1 +/- 28.1 ml) and LVOV, which is equivalent to total stroke volume, was greater in patients with AR (121.7 +/- 61.1 ml) than in normal subjects (64.0 +/- 14.4 ml). DOPRF correlated with RIRF (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01, n = 11). DOPRV (mild: 10.5 +/- 8.5 ml; moderate: 28.8 +/- 13.6 ml; severe: 74.5 +/- 36.7 ml) and DOPRF (mild: 13.7% +/- 11.5%; moderate: 33.1% +/- 14.2%; severe: 52.6% +/- 15.3%) increased markedly with the severity of regurgitation as assessed by cineangiography. In AR, total stroke volume influenced both forward stroke volume and regurgitant volume, and in MR, regurgitant volume influenced both total stroke volume and forward stroke volume. Total stroke volume in AR and regurgitant volume in MR may play a key role in valvular regurgitation.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative Doppler assessment of valvular regurgitation.Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3):841-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.3.841. Circulation. 1993. PMID: 8443904
-
[Pulmonary to systemic flow ratios in patients with ventricular septal defect: estimation by transmitral flow velocity].J Cardiol. 1988 Sep;18(3):823-36. J Cardiol. 1988. PMID: 3074166 Japanese.
-
Limitations of qualitative angiographic grading in aortic or mitral regurgitation.Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 1;53(11):1593-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90585-x. Am J Cardiol. 1984. PMID: 6731304
-
Valvular regurgitation: does cardiovascular magnetic resonance provide additional information compared to echocardiography?Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Aug;57(4):521-35. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009. PMID: 19763073 Review.
-
[Calculation of the regurgitation fraction in mitral insufficiency by Doppler echocardiography using a study of the zone of flow convergence].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997 Jan;90(1):17-25. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997. PMID: 9137711 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Quantitative Doppler-echocardiographic determination of regurgitant volume in patients with aortic insufficiency.Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2008 Mar 4;2:12-9. doi: 10.2174/1874192400802010012. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2008. PMID: 19590613 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials