Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;132(2):192e-200e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586c1.

A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction

Affiliations

A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction

Claudia R Albornoz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The volume-outcome relationship has not been specifically measured for U.S. autologous breast reconstruction. The authors studied whether there is a relationship between hospital procedural volume and perioperative complication rates.

Methods: The authors identified (1) patients who underwent total mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction from 1998 to 2010 and (2) a subset of microsurgical cases from 2008 to 2010. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles based on number of yearly procedures. Outcomes included surgery-specific and systemic complications. A multivariable model was used to analyze the volume-outcome relationship after adjusting for other variables.

Results: Over the 13-year study period, 21,016 immediate autologous reconstructions were recorded. Surgery-specific and systemic complication rates were 13.0 and 7.5 percent, respectively. Ninety-two percent of centers perform a very low (fewer than nine cases per year) or low (nine to 20 cases per year) number of procedures. The highest-volume centers (>44 cases per year) are located in metropolitan areas. An inverse relationship between reconstructive volume and surgery-specific and systemic complications was identified (p<0.01). In the multivariable analysis, centers with very low, low, and medium case volumes were more likely to have surgery-specific complications than high-volume centers (p<0.01). Very-low-volume compared with high-volume centers were more likely to have systemic complications (p<0.01).

Conclusions: Higher volume autologous breast reconstruction centers have lower complication rates. The volume-outcome relationship is stronger for surgery-specific than for systemic complications. Geographic disparities are present in the distribution of high-volume centers. Such information can be used to inform best practices and improve access to care.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, III.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chang AC, Birkmeyer JD. The volume-performance relationship in esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006;16:87–94
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA. Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer. 2006;106:2476–2481
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SR, Tosteson AN, et al. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 1999;125:250–256
    1. Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in lower extremity arterial bypass surgery. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1102–1107
    1. Showstack JA, Rosenfeld KE, Garnick DW, Luft HS, Schaffarzick RW, Fowles J. Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations. JAMA. 1987;257:785–789

Publication types

MeSH terms