Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 23897738
- PMCID: PMC3830689
- DOI: 10.1002/nau.22408
Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Aims: One postulated cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence is urethral and bladder neck hypermobility. The objective of this study was to determine the magnitude of anatomical differences of urethral and bladder neck position at rest and with valsalva in continent and incontinent men post-prostatectomy based on dynamic MRI.
Methods: All subjects underwent a dynamic MRI protocol with valsalva and non-valsalva images and a standard urodynamic evaluation. MRI measurements were taken at rest and with valsalva, including (1) bladder neck to sacrococcygeal inferior pubic point line (SCIPP), (2) urethra to pubis, and (3) bulbar urethra to SCIPP. Data were analyzed in SAS using two-tailed t tests.
Results: A total of 21 subjects (13 incontinent and 8 continent) had complete data and were included in the final analysis. The two groups had similar demographic characteristics. On MRI, there were no statistically significant differences in anatomic position of the bladder neck or urethra either at rest or with valsalva. The amount of hypermobility ranged from 0.8 to 2 mm in all measures. There were also no differences in the amount of hypermobility (position at rest minus position at valsalva) between groups.
Conclusions: We found no statistically significant differences in bladder neck and urethral position or mobility on dynamic MRI evaluation between continent and incontinent men status post-radical prostatectomy. A more complex mechanism for post-prostatectomy incontinence needs to be modeled in order to better understand the continence mechanism in this select group of men.
Keywords: MRI; male incontinence; prostatctomy; urethral hypermobility.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Functional and anatomical differences between continent and incontinent men post radical prostatectomy on urodynamics and 3T MRI: a pilot study.Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Aug;34(6):527-32. doi: 10.1002/nau.22616. Epub 2014 Apr 21. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015. PMID: 24752967 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanism of Action of the Transobturator Sling for Post-Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Multi-institutional Prospective Study Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Urology. 2018 Jun;116:185-192. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.053. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Urology. 2018. PMID: 29567018
-
Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy.J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):233-6. J Urol. 1997. PMID: 8976260
-
The Role of Urodynamics in Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence.Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 26;19(3):21. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0770-7. Curr Urol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29479637 Review.
-
Pathophysiology and Contributing Factors in Postprostatectomy Incontinence: A Review.Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):936-944. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Oct 6. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 27720536 Review.
Cited by
-
Imaging of surgical bed complications after prostatectomy and radiation therapy.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05027-2. Online ahead of print. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 40464846 Review.
-
The extent of changes in the membranous urethra angle is associated with the outcome of retrourethral transobturator sling procedure.Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Feb;47(2):249-55. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0888-6. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25537826
-
Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence.Prostate Int. 2021 Dec;9(4):176-180. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 11. Prostate Int. 2021. PMID: 35059353 Free PMC article.
-
[Imaging for urinary incontinence].Urologe A. 2015 Jul;54(7):963-71. doi: 10.1007/s00120-015-3872-6. Urologe A. 2015. PMID: 26162272 Review. German.
-
Investigating the mechanism underlying urinary continence using dynamic MRI after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):3975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07800-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35273228 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2010;60(5):277–300. Epub 2010/07/09. - PubMed
-
- Harlan LC, Potosky A, Gilliland FD, Hoffman R, Albertsen PC, Hamilton AS, et al. Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: prostate cancer outcomes study. journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001;93(24):1864–71. Epub 2001/12/26. - PubMed
-
- Thompson I, Thrasher JB, Aus G, Burnett AL, Canby-Hagino ED, Cookson MS, et al. Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. The Journal of urology. 2007;177(6):2106–31. Epub 2007/05/19. - PubMed
-
- Katz G, Rodriguez R. Changes in continence and health-related quality of life after curative treatment and watchful waiting of prostate cancer. Urology. 2007;69(6):1157–60. Epub 2007/06/19. - PubMed
-
- Kordan Y, Alkibay T, Sozen S, Bozkurt Y, Acar C, Talu T, et al. Is there an impact of postoperative urethral and periurethral anatomical features in post-radical retropubic prostatectomy incontinence? Urologia internationalis. 2007;78(3):208–13. Epub 2007/04/05. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical