Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;57(9):1304-7.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cit492. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection

Collaborators, Affiliations

Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection

Carolyn V Gould et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is increasingly being adopted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Data from 3 states conducting population-based CDI surveillance showed increases ranging from 43% to 67% in CDI incidence attributable to changing from toxin enzyme immunoassays to NAAT. CDI surveillance requires adjustment for testing methods.

Keywords: Clostridium difficile; clinical laboratory techniques; incidence; nucleic acid amplification techniques; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. D. N. G. holds patents for treatment of CDI licensed to ViroPharma; is a consultant for Merck, ViroPharma, GSK, Roche, Novartis, Optimer, Cubist, Cangene, Sanofi Pasteur, and Actelion; and holds research grants from GOJO. All other authors report no potential conflicts.

All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: preventing Clostridium difficile infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61:157–62. - PubMed
    1. Tenover F, Baron E, Peterson L, Persing D. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty? J Mol Diagn 2011; 13:573–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Horo J, Jones A, Sternke M, Harper C, Safdar N. Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87:643–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Humphries RM, Uslan DZ, Rubin Z. Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:869–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyanton B Jr, Sural P, Loomis C, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification compared to real-time PCR and enzyme immunoassay for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:640–5. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms