Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;67(10):1087-91.
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.137. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

Resting energy expenditure and adiposity accretion among children with Down syndrome: a 3-year prospective study

Affiliations

Resting energy expenditure and adiposity accretion among children with Down syndrome: a 3-year prospective study

D L Hill et al. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher prevalence of obesity than other children. Whether this increased risk for obesity is due to a lower resting energy expenditure (REE) is controversial. Our study assessed whether (1) the REE of children with DS adjusted for fat-free mass (FFM) was lower than that of sibling controls, and (2) the changes in fat mass (FM) over 3 years were associated with FFM-adjusted baseline REE.

Methods: This study used cross-sectional and prospective cohort designs. Four annual measurement visits were conducted with 28 children with DS and 35 sibling controls aged 3-10 years. REE and serum thyroxine (T4) were measured at baseline. Anthropometry, skinfold thickness measures, and, in a subsample, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were used at each visit to calculate FM.

Results: Children with DS had significantly lower REE adjusted for FFM (-78 kcal/day, 95% CI: -133 to -27, P=0.003). The difference remained significant after adjustment for FM, sex and African ancestry (-49 kcal/day, 95% CI: -94 to -4, P=0.03). In the longitudinal analysis, the baseline REE adjusted for baseline FFM was not predictive of FM accretion over time (P=0.8).

Conclusion: Children with DS have lower REE than sibling controls, but REE was not associated with changes in FM over time. The results suggest that the lower REE of children with DS does not explain their increased risk for obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between skinfold and DXA measures of fat free mass.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between skinfold and DXA measures of fat mass.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Resting energy expenditure (REE) predicted by fat free mass for children with Down syndrome and their sibling controls.

References

    1. Roizen NJ, Patterson D. Down’s syndrome. Lancet. 2003 Apr 12;361(9365):1281–1289. - PubMed
    1. Davidson MA. Primary care for children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008 Oct;55(5):1099–1111. xi. - PubMed
    1. Bull MJ. Health supervision for children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics. 2011 Aug;128(2):393–406. - PubMed
    1. Cronk C, Crocker AC, Pueschel SM, Shea AM, Zackai E, Pickens G, et al. Growth charts for children with Down syndrome: 1 month to 18 years of age. Pediatrics. 1988 Jan;81(1):102–110. - PubMed
    1. Styles ME, Cole TJ, Dennis J, Preece MA. New cross sectional stature, weight, and head circumference references for Down's syndrome in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Aug;87(2):104–108. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms