Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul 30;14(8):15838-59.
doi: 10.3390/ijms140815838.

The role of bacterial biofilms and surface components in plant-bacterial associations

Affiliations
Review

The role of bacterial biofilms and surface components in plant-bacterial associations

Pablo C Bogino et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The role of bacterial surface components in combination with bacterial functional signals in the process of biofilm formation has been increasingly studied in recent years. Plants support a diverse array of bacteria on or in their roots, transport vessels, stems, and leaves. These plant-associated bacteria have important effects on plant health and productivity. Biofilm formation on plants is associated with symbiotic and pathogenic responses, but how plants regulate such associations is unclear. Certain bacteria in biofilm matrices have been found to induce plant growth and to protect plants from phytopathogens (a process termed biocontrol), whereas others are involved in pathogenesis. In this review, we systematically describe the various components and mechanisms involved in bacterial biofilm formation and attachment to plant surfaces and the relationships of these mechanisms to bacterial activity and survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bacterial autoaggregation and biofilm development, and their relationship with plant colonization. Cell aggregation and biofilm formation in plant-bacterial associations are regulated by environmental signals, nutrient limitation of growth, quorum sensing, EPSs, flagella, LPSs, and other factors.

References

    1. Branda S.S., Vik S., Friedman L., Kolter R. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13:20–26. - PubMed
    1. Davey M.E., O’Toole G.A. Microbial biofilms: From ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000;64:847–867. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schembri M.A., Christianesen G., Klemm P. FimH-mediated autoaggregation of E. coli. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;41:1419–1430. - PubMed
    1. Costerton J.W., Lewandowski Z., Caldwell D.E., Korber D.R., Lappin-Scott H.M. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995;49:711–745. - PubMed
    1. Rinaudi L.V., Giordano W. An integrated view of biofilm formation in rhizobia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010;304:1–11. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances