Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan;73(1):69-74.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203523. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study)

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab versus intravenous tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (SUMMACTA study)

Gerd R Burmester et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) formulations of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD).

Methods: Patients (n=1262) were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly+placebo-IV every 4 weeks or tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks+placebo-SC weekly in combination with traditional DMARD. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of tocilizumab-SC to tocilizumab-IV with regard to the proportion of patients in each group achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24 using a 12% non-inferiority margin (NIM). Secondary outcomes were disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), ACR responses, health assessment questionnaire scores and safety assessments.

Results: At week 24, 69.4% (95% CI 65.5 to 73.2) of tocilizumab-SC-treated patients versus 73.4% (95% CI 69.6 to 77.1) of tocilizumab-IV-treated patients achieved an ACR20 response (weighted difference between groups -4.0%, 95% CI -9.2 to 1.2); the 12% NIM was met. ACR50/70 responses, DAS28 and physical function improvements were comparable between the tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV groups. The safety profiles of tocilizumab-SC and tocilizumab-IV were similar, and the most common adverse event was infection. Injection-site reactions (ISR) occurred more frequently in the tocilizumab-SC group than in the tocilizumab-IV (placebo-SC) group. No anaphylaxis was reported over the 24 weeks.

Conclusions: Tocilizumab-SC 162 mg weekly demonstrated comparable efficacy to tocilizumab-IV 8 mg/kg. The safety profile of tocilizumab-SC is consistent with the known and well-established safety profile of tocilizumab-IV, with the exception of a higher incidence of ISR, which were more common with tocilizumab-SC administration.

Keywords: DMARDs (biologic); Disease Activity; Rheumatoid Arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition over 24 weeks. TCZ-IV, intravenous tocilizumab; TCZ-SC, subcutaneous tocilizumab. AE, adverse events; qw, weekly.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease activity and physical function over 24 weeks for patients in the per-protocol (PP) population. (A) Proportion of patients in the PP population treated with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC; n=558) or intravenous tocilizumab (TCZ-IV; n=537) achieving 20%, 50% and 70% improvements per American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70) over 24 weeks. (B) Proportion of patients achieving remission based on disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28) based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR <2.6) over 24 weeks. (C) Proportion of patients achieving a health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) response (improvement of ≥0.3 from baseline) over 24 weeks. qw, weekly.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of patients stratified by weight in the per-protocol population treated with either subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC; n=558) or intravenous tocilizumab (TCZ-IV; n=537) (A) achieving 20%, 50% and 70% improvements per American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70) over 24 weeks and (B) achieving remission based on disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28) based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR <2.6) over 24 weeks. qw, weekly.

References

    1. Scott DL. Biologics-based therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91:30–43 - PubMed
    1. Maini RN, Taylor PC, Szechinski J, et al. Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of the interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab, in European patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an incomplete response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2817–29 - PubMed
    1. Ohta S, Tsuru T, Terao K. Optimal dose prediction by pharmacokinetic and biomarker response of subcutaneous tocilizumab treatment a Phase I/II study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:S1115
    1. Stubenrauch K, Wessels U, Birnboeck H, et al. Subset analysis of patients experiencing clinical events of a potentially immunogenic nature in the pivotal clinical trials of tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis: Evaluation of an antidrug antibody ELISA using clinical adverse event-driven immunogenicity testing. Clin Ther 2010;32:1597–609 - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Beaulieu A, Rubbert-Roth A, et al. Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet 2008;371:987–97 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms