Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug 1;36(8):1163-71.
doi: 10.5665/sleep.2878.

Randomized controlled trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) versus servoventilation in patients with CPAP-induced central sleep apnea (complex sleep apnea)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized controlled trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) versus servoventilation in patients with CPAP-induced central sleep apnea (complex sleep apnea)

Dominic Dellweg et al. Sleep. .

Abstract

Study objectives: To compare the treatment effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and anticyclic servoventilation in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-induced central sleep apnea (complex sleep apnea).

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Sleep center.

Patients: Thirty patients who developed complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) during CPAP treatment.

Interventions: NPPV or servoventilation.

Measurements and results: Patients were randomized to NPPV or servo-ventilation. Full polysomnography (PSG) was performed after 6 weeks. On CPAP prior to randomization, patients in the NPPV and servoventilator arm had comparable apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI, 28.6 ± 6.5 versus 27.7 ± 9.7 events/h (mean ± standard deviation [SD])), apnea indices (AI,19 ± 5.6 versus 21.1 ± 8.6 events/h), central apnea indices (CAI, 16.7 ± 5.4 versus 18.2 ± 7.1 events/h), oxygen desaturation indices (ODI,17.5 ± 13.1 versus 24.3 ± 11.9 events/h). During initial titration NPPV and servoventilation significantly improved the AHI (9.1 ± 4.3 versus 9 ± 6.4 events/h), AI (2 ± 3.1 versus 3.5 ± 4.5 events/h) CAI (2 ± 3.1 versus 2.5 ± 3.9 events/h) and ODI (10.1 ± 4.5 versus 8.9 ± 8.4 events/h) when compared to CPAP treatment (all P < 0.05). After 6 weeks we observed the following differences: AHI (16.5 ± 8 versus 7.4 ± 4.2 events/h, P = 0.027), AI (10.4 ± 5.9 versus 1.7 ± 1.9 events/h, P = 0.001), CAI (10.2 ± 5.1 versus 1.5 ± 1.7 events/h, P < 0.0001)) and ODI (21.1 ± 9.2 versus 4.8 ± 3.4 events/h, P < 0.0001) for NPPV and servoventilation, respectively. Other sleep parameters were unaffected by any form of treatment.

Conclusions: After 6 weeks, servoventilation treated respiratory events more effectively than NPPV in patients with complex sleep apnea syndrome.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01609244.

Keywords: CPAP; NPPV; central sleep apnea; complex sleep apnea; servo-ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow, allocation to and dropout from the two treatment arms (noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) and servoventilation).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Polysomnographic tracing of a patient who developed complex sleep apnea during continuous positive airway pressure treatment. The screenshot represents a period of 5 min where periodic central apneas are marked in red within the flow channel, corresponding desaturations are displayed in the oxygen saturation (SaO2) channel and are marked in red.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Trend of the respiratory parameters of the two randomized arms that differed significantly at the end of the treatment period. Sigificance was determined by one-way analysis of variance. Post hoc analysis was carried out using the Scheffé procedure in case of equal variances and the Games-Howell test in case of unequal variances. CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; NPPV, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

Comment in

References

    1. Morgenthaler TI, Kagramanov V, Hanak V, Decker PA. Complex sleep apnea syndrome: is it a unique clinical syndrome? Sleep. 2006;29:1203–9. - PubMed
    1. Aurora RN, Chowdhuri S, Ramar K, et al. The treatment of central sleep apnea syndromes in adults: practice parameters with an evidence-based literature review and meta-analyses. Sleep. 2012;35:17–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilmartin GS, Daly RW, Thomas RJ. Recognition and management of complex sleep-disordered breathing. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2005;11:485–93. - PubMed
    1. Lehman S, Antic NA, Thompson C, Catcheside PG, Mercer J, McEvoy RD. Central sleep apnea on commencement of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with a primary diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3:462–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Javaheri S, Goetting MG, Khayat R, Wylie PE, Goodwin JL, Parthasara-thy S. The performance of two automatic servo-ventilation devices in the treatment of central sleep apnea. Sleep. 2011;34:1693–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data