Laser resurfacing pearls
- PMID: 23904821
- PMCID: PMC3580978
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329417
Laser resurfacing pearls
Abstract
Ablative skin resurfacing using the carbon dioxide laser was long considered the gold standard for treatment of photoaging, acne scars, and rhytids. However, conventional full-face carbon dioxide resurfacing is associated with significant risk of side effects and a prolonged postoperative recovery period. Fractional resurfacing has recently revolutionized laser surgery by offering close to comparable results with minimal side effects and a more rapid recovery. Although fractional devices have grown in popularity, and have essentially replaced traditional resurfacing, fractional resurfacing can still be a challenging modality to control precisely due to hardware variations across comparable devices, the range of settings that can be used, and patient-specific considerations. Certain precautions and rules of thumb can reduce the risk associated with fractional resurfacing, and increase the likelihood of a good outcome.
Keywords: ablative; fractional lasers; nonablative; skin resurfacing.
References
-
- Tannous Z. Fractional resurfacing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(5):480–486. - PubMed
-
- Alam M, Dover J S, Arndt K A. To ablate or not: a proposal regarding nomenclature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(6):1170–1174. - PubMed
-
- Alexiades-Armenakas M R Dover J S Arndt K A The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing J Am Acad Dermatol 2008585719–737., quiz 738–740 - PubMed
-
- Brightman L A Brauer J A Anolik R et al.Ablative and fractional ablative lasers Dermatol Clin 2009274479–489., vi–vii - PubMed
-
- Marra D E, Yip D, Fincher E F, Moy R L. Systemic toxicity from topically applied lidocaine in conjunction with fractional photothermolysis. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(8):1024–1026. - PubMed
