Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Oct;131(1):21-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.100. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Independent radiologic review of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0218, a phase III trial of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Independent radiologic review of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0218, a phase III trial of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

Robert A Burger et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0218 (GOG-0218), a phase III, placebo-controlled trial in newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer (OC), demonstrated a benefit in investigator (INV)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) with bevacizumab (BEV) administered with and following carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) for up to 15 months vs. CP alone. To determine the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in assessing disease progression (PD) in GOG-0218, an independent review of radiologic and clinical data (IRC) was conducted.

Methods: Blinded reviews followed RECIST 1.0 in accordance with the study protocol; PFS was analyzed in the intent-to-treat population.

Results: CP+BEV→BEV achieved a significant PFS improvement in both assessments. Hazard ratios for PFS (IRC: 0.623; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.503-0.772; p<0.0001 vs. INV: 0.624; 95% CI: 0.520-0.749; p<0.0001) and the improvement in median PFS (IRC: 19.1 and 13.1 months vs. INV: 18.2 and 12 months) were similar between IRC and INV assessments. There was high concordance between IRC- and INV-determined PD status (77%) and date (73%). Subgroup analyses were consistent with the primary IRC findings. Early and late discontinuation discordance measures showed no evidence of INV bias.

Conclusion: IRC analysis confirmed a significant PFS improvement with CP+BEV→BEV vs. CP alone. Concordance was not influenced by extent of residual disease after cytoreductive surgery or initial stage. The IRC size, high participation rate, and strong concordance between IRC and INV assessments suggest that RECIST can be applied objectively in OC studies.

Keywords: Bevacizumab; IRC; Independent review; Ovarian cancer; Phase 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GOG-0218 study design. AUC, area under the curve; BEV, bevacizumab; CP, carboplatin plus paclitaxel; GOG, Gynecologic Oncology Group. *No residual tumor implants exceeding 1 cm in maximal diameter. Any residual tumor implant exceeding 1 cm in any dimension.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS for regimen 3 vs. regimen 1 as determined by the IRC vs. INV. BEV, bevacizumab; CP, carboplatin plus paclitaxel; INV, investigator; IRC, independent review committee; PFS, progression-free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United States Food and Drug Administration . United States Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry: Clinical Trial Endpoints for the Approval of Cancer Drugs and Biologics. US Department of Health and Human Services; Rockville, MD: 2007. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati....
    1. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use . European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Guideline for the Evaluation of Anticancer Medicinal Products in Man. London, UK: 2006. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin....
    1. Amit O, Mannino F, Stone AM, et al. Blinded independent central review of progression in cancer clinical trials: Results from a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1772–8. - PubMed
    1. Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, et al. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. New Engl J Med. 2011;365:2473–83. - PubMed
    1. Stuart GC, Kitchener H, Bacon M, et al. 2010 Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus statement on clinical trials in ovarian cancer: Report from the Fourth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21:750–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms