Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Sep;24(9):1791-800.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613481233. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory

Mark A McDaniel  1 , Pamela Lamontagne, Stefanie M Beck, Michael K Scullin, Todd S Braver
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory

Mark A McDaniel et al. Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Identifying the processes by which people remember to execute an intention at an appropriate moment (prospective memory) remains a fundamental theoretical challenge. According to one account, top-down attentional control is required to maintain activation of the intention, initiate intention retrieval, or support monitoring. A diverging account suggests that bottom-up, spontaneous retrieval can be triggered by cues that have been associated with the intention and that sustained attentional processes are not required. We used a specialized experimental design and functional MRI methods to selectively marshal and identify each process. Results revealed a clear dissociation. One prospective-memory task recruited sustained activity in attentional-control areas, such as the anterior prefrontal cortex; the other engaged purely transient activity in parietal and ventral brain regions associated with attentional capture, target detection, and episodic retrieval. These patterns provide critical evidence that there are two neural routes to prospective memory, with each route emerging under different circumstances.

Keywords: cognitive neuroscience; memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Green: sustained activations selective to the Nonfocal condition; Red: overlap of transient activations on both Focal and Nonfocal PM trials; Yellow: overlap regions showing both Nonfocal sustained and transient activations (in both conditions).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sustained and transient effects in left aPFC ROI (8mm sphere at −34, 56, 9) for Focal and Nonfocal PM. PM Sus: sustained effect in PM block, CTL Sus: sustained effect in control block; PM: transient effect on PM trials (correct trials only); Ong-PM: transient effect for category decision task trials (ongoing trials) during the PM block; Ong- CTL: transient effect for ongoing trials during the control block.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A. Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) effects between right middle temporal gyrus (62 −12 −16) and precuneus (−2 −72 40) and the left aPFC. B. The precuneus shows stronger left aPFC connectivity in the Nonfocal condition, but greater PM transient activity in the Focal condition. C. The right temporal cortex (TC) shows stronger left aPFC connectivity in the Focal condition, and also stronger PM transient activity in this condition as well. PM: transient effect on PM trials (correct trials only); Ong-PM: transient effect for category decision task trials (ongoing trials) during the PM block; Ong- CTL: transient effect for ongoing trials during the control block.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A. Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) effects between right middle temporal gyrus (62 −12 −16) and precuneus (−2 −72 40) and the left aPFC. B. The precuneus shows stronger left aPFC connectivity in the Nonfocal condition, but greater PM transient activity in the Focal condition. C. The right temporal cortex (TC) shows stronger left aPFC connectivity in the Focal condition, and also stronger PM transient activity in this condition as well. PM: transient effect on PM trials (correct trials only); Ong-PM: transient effect for category decision task trials (ongoing trials) during the PM block; Ong- CTL: transient effect for ongoing trials during the control block.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beck SM, Ruge H, Walser M, Goschke T. The Functional Neuroanatomy of Spontaneous Retrieval and Strategic Monitoring of Delayed Intentions. Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden; Dresden, Germany: 2012. Manuscript under review. - PubMed
    1. Braver TS. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2012;16(2):106–113. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckner RL, Carroll DC. Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2007;11(2):49–57. - PubMed
    1. Bugg JM, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Event-Based Prospective Remembering: An Integration of Prospective Memory and Cognitive Control Theories. In: Reisberg D, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology. (in press)
    1. Burgess PW, Gonen-Yaacovi G, Volle E. Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(8):2246–2257. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources