Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome
- PMID: 23909780
- DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130719-03
Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate characteristics of straylight before and after thin-flap LASIK performed with femtosecond laser versus with mechanical microkeratome and assess changes at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
Methods: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive eyes from 66 patients were included in this prospective study. Sixty-one eyes of 31 patients had thin-flap LASIK with femtosecond laser. In addition, 67 eyes from 35 patients underwent thin-flap LASIK with mechanical microkeratome were included for comparison. Following flap creation, all eyes were ablated using the VIXS S4 excimer laser system (Visx USA, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Straylight values were measured using the C-Quant straylight meter (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.
Results: Preoperatively, the mean straylight values were 0.93 ± 0.11. After femtosecond laser-assisted thin-flap LASIK, the values were 1.00 ± 0.11, 0.98 ± 0.10, and 0.99 ± 0.12 at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, respectively, and significantly increased (F = 7.62, P > .0001) compared to preoperative values. However, these values decreased and returned to preoperative levels at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (0.92 ± 0.09 and 0.89 ± 0.13, respectively; P > .05). The postoperative-preoperative increases in straylight were reduced in the femtosecond laser group compared to the mechanical microkeratome group (0.05 ± 0.13 vs 0.10 ± 0.13 at 1 month postoperatively; P < .05). This difference was statistically significant at 1 month postoperatively (P = .04). A negative significant correlation was also found between preoperative straylight values and postoperative-preoperative increases.
Conclusions: Straylight increased significantly in the early stages after femtosecond laser-assisted thin-flap LASIK. However, these values improved over time and gradually returned to preoperative levels, which may be related to the progression of corneal healing.
Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.
Similar articles
-
Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;38(6):992-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.025. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012. PMID: 22624898
-
Comparison of Forward Light Scatter Changes Between SMILE, Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK, and Epipolis LASIK: Results of a 1-Year Prospective Study.J Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;31(11):752-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-04. J Refract Surg. 2015. PMID: 26544563
-
Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.019. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17070593 Clinical Trial.
-
Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK Flap Complications.J Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;32(1):52-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151119-01. J Refract Surg. 2016. PMID: 26812715 Review.
-
Microkeratome versus femtosecond flaps: accuracy and complications.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;25(4):270-4. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000070. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24837579 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Optical Quality between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser LASIK.J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2507973. doi: 10.1155/2016/2507973. Epub 2016 Nov 10. J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27957338 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources