Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of diastolic dysfunction in a population without heart disease: a gender-based study
- PMID: 23912903
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2976-x
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of diastolic dysfunction in a population without heart disease: a gender-based study
Abstract
Objectives: Asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is increasingly recognised as an important diagnosis. Our goal was to study the prevalence and gender differences in subclinical LV diastolic dysfunction, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 3 T.
Methods: We prospectively studied 48 volunteers (19 male and 29 female, mean age 49 ± 7 years) with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. We used CMR to measure left atrium (LA) and LV volumes, LV peak filling rate and transmitral flow.
Results: The overall prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in our cohort varied between 20 % (based on evaluation of LV filing profiles) and 24 % (based on the evaluation of the transmitral flow). The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction was higher in men than in women, independently of the criteria used (P between 0.004 and 0.022). Indexed LV end-diastolic volume, indexed LV stroke volume, indexed LV mass, indexed LA minimum volume and indexed LA maximum volume were significantly greater in men than in women (P < 0.05). All the subjects had LV ejection fractions within the normal range.
Conclusions: It is clinically feasible to study diastolic flow and LV filling with CMR. CMR detected diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic men and women.
Key points: • CMR imaging offers new possibilities in assessing left ventricular diastolic function. • The prevalence of diastolic dysfunction is higher in men than in women. • The prevalence of some diastolic dysfunction in a normal population is 24 %.
Similar articles
-
Biplane versus short-axis measures of the left atrium and ventricle in patients with systolic dysfunction assessed by magnetic resonance.Clin Imaging. 2016 Sep-Oct;40(5):907-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 30. Clin Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27183139
-
Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden.Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1284-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02864-3. Am J Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 12480035
-
Wall stress determines systolic and diastolic function--Characteristics of heart failure.Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;202:685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.09.032. Epub 2015 Sep 25. Int J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26454537 Clinical Trial.
-
Pathophysiology and Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Feb;32(2):216-232.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.11.011. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019. PMID: 30717860 Review.
-
Evaluation of left ventricular torsion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jul 24;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-49. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012. PMID: 22827856 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Age-specific changes in left ventricular diastolic function: a velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging study.Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr;25(4):1077-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3488-z. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25430004
-
Assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic abnormalities in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018 Oct 2;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12947-018-0142-y. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2018. PMID: 30285887 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of diastolic dysfunction: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques.ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):2637-2649. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12846. Epub 2020 Jul 20. ESC Heart Fail. 2020. PMID: 32686332 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources